Review Fuji S5 Pro

Well, in primul rand costul in sine este semnificativ.
Apoi cei 6MP neinterpolati sunt putini dar sunt la un sharpness mai mare decat orice alta camera din aceasta categorie (6MP). Cred ca daca nu se fac cropuri este suficient.
D.R. de 12EV pe jpeg este absolut uimitor. Sigur ca pentru calitate maxima vine cu fisiere RAW duble ca dimensiune, dar de, baba sufera la frumusete
Zgomotul la peste ISO 800 mai mic chiar decat D200... Si culorile mai bune...
Nu are capabilitatea de buffering a lui D200, asta este o limitare destul de importanta...
Si in ultimul rand pretul cam piparat... a am zis deja asta?

Apoi cei 6MP neinterpolati sunt putini dar sunt la un sharpness mai mare decat orice alta camera din aceasta categorie (6MP). Cred ca daca nu se fac cropuri este suficient.

Din comparatia din linkul de mai sus intre S5 30D si D200, chiar si la 6MP, Fuji sta cel mai slab.
Asta nu e neaparat un lucru rau din punctul meu de vedere.

Just like the S2 Pro and S3 Pro before it, the S5 Pro has six million effective photosites ('input pixels'), but Fujifilm's SuperCCD honeycomb layout means these are first interpolated up to a twelve megapixel image. If the camera is in twelve megapixel output mode this is then sharpened and saved, if in a lower resolution mode the image is downsampled, sharpened and saved. A simplified in-camera workflow can be seen below for 12 mp and 6 mp images:

6 mp RAW honeycomb -> 12 mp square -> sharpen -> save
6 mp RAW honeycomb -> 12 mp square -> 6 mp downsample -> sharpen -> save

The S5 Pro's twelve megapixel images do appear to offer slightly more detail than six megapixel images, most of this is down to the quality of the camera's downsampling algorithm (and at what point sharpening is applied). The rule of thumb (in our opinion) is that while 12 mp images may exhibit slightly more detail the gain isn't significant or worthwhile shooting in 12 mp mode all the time (it's often very hard to distinguish the difference between a 6 mp and 12 mp).