Islanda declara ca toate religiile sunt tulburari mentale

Am gasit astazi un articol foarte dragut, dupa parerea mea:

"*Reykyavik, Iceland – This small island country in the North Atlantic is home to many controversies. The country’s parliament voted in 2017 to place mental health warnings on all Bibles. In that same year, the nation took another secular step forward by banning American televangelists. Iceland is now declaring all religions to be psychological disorders.
The Alþingi (the nation’s parliament) voted overwhelmingly in favor of the statute 60-3. The three politicians who voted against the decree reportedly believed the measure didn’t go far enough. “We don’t want to end up like the United States or Saudi Arabia, do we?” one anonymous representative mused."

sursa

Ce credeti? Eu zic ca este un pas mic, dar sigur pentru a intelege ca societatea evolueaza, iar reperele de acum sute, chiar mii de ani, nu ne vor mai ajuta pentru un viitor mai prosper.

https://semneletimpu...-razgandit.html
Un ateu care a inteles cu adevarat complexitatea ADN-ului si a afirmat corect, ca trebuie sa fi fost implicata o inteligenta.

Ce credeti? Eu zic ca este un pas mic, dar sigur pentru a intelege ca societatea evolueaza, iar reperele de acum sute, chiar mii de ani, nu ne vor mai ajuta pentru un viitor mai prosper.

Pana la urma, stirea e reala, sau nu?
Daca e adevarata, mi se pare un pas mic pentru om, un pas mare pentru omenire. Sa scapam de fantomele invizibile la care inca se inchina credulii.

Pana la urma, stirea e reala, sau nu?

Eu zic ca stiu.

Fake News.
Articolul ala este dintr-un fel de "Times New Roman".

Hello, my name is Andrew Hall and I’m the author of Laughing in Disbelief. Before getting to business I just want to thank you for taking some time and reading one of my posts. I appreciate it!
You probably clicked a link to a story and you’re here.
The story you were reading is satirical.

The Oxford Living Dictionary defines satire as:
The use of humour, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people’s stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.

Well, there you go. That’s what I try to achieve on Laughing in Disbelief. Under normal circumstances, my humble blog is similar to The Onion. As many of you know, The Onion publishes satirical stories poking fun at everyday problems everyday people face as well as pointing out the hypocrisy of the rich and powerful. Think of Laughing in Disbelief as The Onion on drugs. Like meth. Or bath salts.

I hope I’m providing laughs for people who are left of center (Hey! That’s the name of a Facebook group I run). I also think atheists, Satanists, agnostics, Brights, and antitheists will have a chuckle!

Some of you may not think what I do is nice. And that’s for several reasons:
One: You may say to yourself “I didn’t know the post was satirical.”
OK, well, there are several winks to readers that signal the article is a joke.
One of them is the link that brought you here.

Another wink is that someone in the story has a name derived from canard. It’s typically Andrew Canard. The word canard not only means duck but also an unfounded rumor or story.
Sometimes I like to name the people in the post are named after Confederate generals or Nazis.
And, of course, the name of the blog is Laughing in Disbelief. Richard Dawkins once remarked on my old blog, Laughing in Purgatory, that the name alone should tell people it’s satirical. I think the same principle applies.
All of these, my friends, are signs that the story is satirical.

Pana la urma, stirea e reala, sau nu?
Daca e adevarata, mi se pare un pas mic pentru om, un pas mare pentru omenire. Sa scapam de fantomele invizibile la care inca se inchina credulii.

reperele de acum sute, chiar mii de ani,