Despre detectoarele radar

O noua provocare:

Am citit si eu asa zisul articol. NU AM INTELES NIIC DIN EL FIIND SCRIS IN LIMBA MAGHIARA, PROBABIL.
Cum adica detector de masini furate, pe o raza de 2 km, nr de inmatriculare, etc etc
Poate sa traduca cineva?

Eu am vazut de mai multe ori  la Saliste (Sibiu-Sebes)-pozitionat strategic la o benzinarie, la Strehaia(Severin-Filiasi) undeva unde este o restrictie de 30km/h(se lucreaza la drum),la Filiasi si in apropiere de Pitesti (din directia Craiova-acelasi radar pe care il muta si pe Pitesti-Valcea un Logan rosu).Oricum cel mai periculos cred ca este cel din Arges ,il porneste cand esti langa el. Din cauza lui am capatat un reflex , cand vad logan rosu departe ,eu sunt deja cu piciorul pe frana ,chiar daca sunt la Cluj.

These are common errors encountered in operating Police radar:
The Texas Department of Public Safety produced a comprehensive manual based on the Federal tests. It cautions operators, "...the radar does not generate 'false' readings. Anytime a reading appears, the radar has sensed a signal. The radar operator must be familiar with situations that can produce 'error' readings." If the operator does not detect the error, a ticket will be wrongfully issued.


Here are the radar "errors" detailed by the Texas manual:

1. Antenna Positioning Error
The radar beam travels in a straight line, neither bending around curves nor following the contour of hilly terrain. If the antenna is not properly positioned, it may seem to clock an approaching car when, in fact, it's clocking another car in the background.

[ http://www.pbelectronics.com/custimages/error1.gif - Pentru incarcare in pagina (embed) Click aici ]

[ http://www.pbelectronics.com/custimages/error1a.gif - Pentru incarcare in pagina (embed) Click aici ]





2. Look-Past Error
Even if the operator aims his antenna properly, radar is still subject to "look-past" error. This is caused by the radar looking past a small reflection in the foreground to read a larger reflection behind. This error is all the more insidious because poorly-trained operators assume it can't happen.

Texas instructors warn, "It is a widely-held misconception that the reflected target signal received by the radar antenna will always be that of the closest vehicle to the antenna. There are times, due to traffic conditions, that the closest vehicle is not returning the strongest signal."

Evidence of the potential size of this error appeared in Car and Driver (October, 1979). The author measured the effective range of a Kustom Signals KR11 traffic radar against various vehicles. The typical small sedan did not show up on the radar until it was less than 1200 feet away from the antenna, but the same radar unit locked on to a Ford 9000 semi at 7600 feet. This shows how common vehicles reflect microwaves differently.

The Texas instructors confirm this problem with radar, saying "It is not unfair to say that the reading you register could be a larger, better target three-quarters of a mile down the road."



[ http://www.pbelectronics.com/custimages/error2.gif - Pentru incarcare in pagina (embed) Click aici ]





3. Vehicle Interference Error


"Vehicle interference" error occurs when moving radar is used in traffic. For example, traffic ahead can confuse the radar's estimate of patrol speed. Moving radar calculates target speed by subtracting patrol speed from the closing speed of the target. Therefore, anything that produces a low evaluation of patrol speed will automatically result in a high speed reading of target speed.

Texas tells its radar operators that this "...situation becomes more critical if difference in patrol speed and interference-vehicle speed is five to ten mph. A target vehicle moving 61 mph may be recorded at 66-71. These borderline speeds are more difficult to detect with the eye."



[ http://www.pbelectronics.com/custimages/error3.gif - Pentru incarcare in pagina (embed) Click aici ]





4. Cosine Error
Cosine error produces a result similar to Interference error except no moving traffic need be present. A stationary object adjacent to the road, such as a building, or road machinery, or even a sign, makes a more efficient reflector than horizontal pavement. Therefore the radar uses that reflection as the basis of patrol speed.

If this reflector were positioned straight ahead on a collision path, the patrol speed estimate would be close enough. But the further the object is located off a direct line to the target, the lower will be the estimate of patrol speed. This is a simple trigonometry problem relating to the cosine of the angle between the target and the ground reflector, hence the name Cosine error. Since Cosine error always makes patrol speed seem smaller than it actually is, it always acts to raise the reading of target speed.



[ http://www.pbelectronics.com/custimages/error4.gif - Pentru incarcare in pagina (embed) Click aici ]





5. Double-Bounce Error
Microwaves are easily reflected. That's what makes radar possible. But the operator must be aware of the difference between an ordinary reflection and a bad bounce. Big objects such as trucks are very efficient reflectors, and it's possible for the radar beam to bounce off several moving trucks at once, always producing erroneous readings.



[ http://www.pbelectronics.com/custimages/error5.gif - Pentru incarcare in pagina (embed) Click aici ]





6. Beam-Reflection error
Because microwaves are so readily reflected, Texas instructors recommend caution, even in mounting the antenna within the patrol car. They say it's possible that a reflective path can be set up through the rearview mirror that will produce radar readings on vehicles behind the patrol car when the radar is aimed forward. And those vehicles behind can be either coming or going, since radar does not distinguish directions.



[ http://www.pbelectronics.com/custimages/error6.gif - Pentru incarcare in pagina (embed) Click aici ]





7. Road-sign error
The ready reflectability of microwaves means that road signs are also source of errors.



[ http://www.pbelectronics.com/custimages/error7.gif - Pentru incarcare in pagina (embed) Click aici ]





8. Radio-Interference Error
According to the Texas course, "UHF radio now in use can force radar to read various numbers when you transmit, or just key the mike. Citizens band radio transmissions from within the patrol vehicle can cause ghosting (false readings)." It recommends that no radio transmissions be made while clocking target vehicles.

9. Fan-Interference error
When the antenna is mounted inside the patrol car, the Texas course says, "Radar will have a tendency to read the pulse of the fan motor (air conditioner, heater, or defroster)." The instructors go on to say, however, that the fan reading will disappear when a target comes into range, and that the fan will not distort the speed reading of the target car.

However, in the case of moving radar, they say, "Sometimes a steady fan speed will override patrol car speed reflected from the roadway." When this happens, the false speed reading produced by the fan will be substituted for patrol speed in the moving radar's calculation of target speed. Since the calculation consists of subtracting patrol speed from closing speed, if the fan reading is less than patrol speed, then the speed displayed for the target will be incorrectly high.

cum mah sa tipe langa gatso (e chiar bun detectorul tau - sau ar trebui sa fie).

de reglat puterea cu care emit la gatso - nu am vazut astfel de reclamatii pe alte forumuri (cum ca ar scadea distanta de detectie)

Cand am ajuns la Timisul de Sus insa, chiar la intrare, era tras cu spatele spre sosea un Logan galben. Datorita unui sofer care m-a flashuit si a faptului ca auzisem de Loganul galben de Brasov, am lasat-o moale. Intr-adevar era radar, am vazut politistul in masina, iar pe la mijlocul localitatii erau cei care opreau. Cu siguranta a fost vorba de un Traffipax, detectorul meu nu a dat decat o alarma scurta in X (care nu cred totusi ca avea legatura cu radarul, desi s-a intamplat chiar in dreptul lui). In rest nu a zis absolut nimic. Asa ca aveti grija in zona aia, limita este de 50 km/ora iar radarul e pus in panta, unde aproape sigur masina prinde viteza mai mare...

Alexpreda spune-mi si mie te rog ce fel de detector foloseste cel care apare in filmuletele facute in Pitesti(la cele 2 radare).Eu am un Cobra 9330 si nu le vede de la o distanta asa mare!Trebuie sa-l schimb,deaceea vreau sa stiu ce fel de detector era ala!