Intel I7

Intel Core i7 920 2.66Ghz   asta iese la 1150 lei ca vad ca sunt in lire preturile ...deci pe la noi va fi minim 1400 lei pt un quad core la 2,66
vi se pare ieftin?... mie nu

Mie mi se pare ca nici nu am sa ma uit la el pentru ce ofera.A daca promitea dela 30% in sus performante in jocuri fata de celelalte quad-uri da , asa Nu.Ma intreb cine v-a fi in stare sa tina procesorul ala numai la 100%

Quote

SURSA: http://yourpc.ro/cat...rii-performante

RaduG, on Oct 7 2008, 19:02, said:

Deci  :death:

Adio O.C. ....  :blink:

http://www.fudzilla....c...4&Itemid=37 totusi exista sperante deci va rog fumos :lol: prea culmea sa limiteze la 1.65V la memorii.
Daca vrei sa bagi kit de 1800/2000 alea nu au nevoie de peste 1.8?

Tot giagbyte volataje separate la RAM pe X58 deci OC la greu se observa mai jos in articol un here si acolo poti vedea tot biosul de X58 gigabyte

Iar ai scris cum scrii tu deobicei dar ideea am prins-o: OC-ul este posibil :coolspeak:.

Merdiso, on Oct 13 2008, 18:22, said:

                   Poate ca nu mai este nevoie de OC, deocamdata:
"Intel Core i7 processor 965 (3.0GHz) delivers 52% speed improvement in 3D games, 41% higher performance in media encoding and editing applications as well as 38% greater 3D rendering speed when compared to Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (3.0GHz). If the information regarding performance improvements is correct, then it means that the new micro-architecture in its first implementation provides roughly 52% more performance at the same clock-speed compared to currently used Core 2 micro-architecture."
                   Pentru cei "nerabdatori":
“I am pleased to announce that we began shipments of our Nehalem product family during the third quarter and expect to formally launch these products in November. Nehalem brings a new micro-architecture and new performance features. This new product family will further extend our performance leadership in microprocessors,” said Mr. Otellini while announcing financial results for the third quarter.
                  
Si alte "picanterii" ale noilor procesoare Intel:
"The main micro-architectural enhancement for Intel Core i7/Nehalem that Intel has discussed so far is increased parallelism – the new microprocessors will be able to execute 33% more concurrent micro-ops at the same time. Additional improvements include faster unaligned cache accesses and faster synchronization primitives. In order to exclude situations when execution units stand idle, Intel also implemented new 2nd level branch predictor.

Another key enhancement of Intel Nehalem is completely redesigned cache sub-system. The new chips will feature 2nd level 512 entry translation look-aside buffer (in addition to 1st level TLB) in order to further reduce the so-called TLB miss rate, a completely new feature on x86 microprocessors. In addition, Intel Nehalem processors (at least, in certain implementations) will have three-level cache hierarchy: 64KB L1 (32KB for data, 32KB for instructions), 256KB L2 cache per core, 8MB L3 cache per processor. Traditionally, Intel chips use inclusive cache policy.

The Intel Core i7 chips will feature triple-channel DDR3 memory controller (with up to 1333MHz clock-speed supported initially), will use Quick Path Interconnect (QPI) bus and will support multi-threading technology similar with Intel Hyper-Threading that was first unveiled back in 2002 as well as SSE4.2 instructions."

Vedeti ca avem ocazia sa testam asa ceva... eMAG pune la dispozitie spre testare o platforma Nehalem (un Bloomfield Extreme si componente compatibile) pe care le putem castiga la final.

GTA-FT, on Oct 16 2008, 12:41, said:

Daca o sa fie adevarat cu siguranta ca nu mai merita, asa ar cam face banii nehalem-urile, la 10-15% nu prea meritau :thumbdown:.

Si alti producatori se concentreaza pe viitoarele platforme cu Intel i7: http://www.ocztechno.../press/2008/311.

La momentul actual nu are nimeni nevoie de performanta unui Nehalem. C2D + 775 va avea viata lunga de acum inainte.

RaduG, on Oct 18 2008, 22:33, said:

si eu ma mutumesc momentan cu C2D, dar :) vor fi multi care vor vrea sa fie in pas cu moda...

RaduG, on Oct 18 2008, 22:33, said:

Oare? Gandeste-te ca sunt oameni ale caror afaceri depind de randari rapide in diverse programe de prelucrare grafica/audio...

TTL, on Oct 20 2008, 22:48, said:

Bine, atunci il rectific eu pe RaduG :).La momentul actual nu are nimeni nevoie de performanta unui Nehalem. C2Q + 775 va avea viata lunga de acum inainte.

Merdiso, on Oct 21 2008, 14:40, said:

Nu prea sunt de acord: Clarksfield, varianta mobila a Nehalem va aduce, pe langa performanta superioara actualei generatii si un consum de energie redus, controller de memorie integrat si un powermanagement mult mai eficient decat platforma Centrino2.

Acelasi lucru este valabil si pentru Nehalem - i7.
Asa ca performanta unui CPU nu se mai rezuma de mult la puncte in CPU Mark. Vorbim aici de performance/watt, unde i7 poate deveni o solutie, odata cu scaderea preturilor.

hubbabub1601, on Oct 21 2008, 14:59, said:

Nu te grabi la asa ceva, daca amd nu ii va face concurenta intelului nu va fi concurenta pe piata CPU-urilor =>> INTEL va dicta preturile pietii, doar daca AMD ar avea preturi foarte bune care ar compensa lipsei performantei pe langa intel i7 ;).

Merdiso, on Oct 21 2008, 15:24, said:

Eh, nicio graba. Este lucru stiut cum ca Intel dicteaza piata doar ca, uite, chiar si in contextul actual, mai toata lumea merge pe intel, chiar daca pretul este mai mare decat AMD. Sunt destui de multi utilizatori ce pun accent si pe consum, silentiozitate, fiabilitate, nu doar pe raw-performance. Lucru la care, oricum, Intel depaseste AMD pe segmente de produse echivalente.

Acum, cu achizitia texanilor de catre arabii aia plin de bani:), zvonurile cum ca ar trece o parte din productie catre IBM, chiar in 32 nano, deja lucrurile iau o intorsatura interesanta.
Ramane de urmarit.

Eu unul o sa fac pasul spre un i7 entry level, cel ce va costa in jur de ~300 USD cu taxe, asta dupa ce ma conving cum ca depaseste X2 6000+ -ul din al meu desktop.