Climate strike

S-a ajuns la asa nivel incat nu mai conteaza daca vrei tu sau nu sa cumperi produse facute in Asia. In marea majoritate a cazurilor nu ai ce sa iei altceva. Contractele comerciale le fac altii, carora le convine sa ia ieftin din Asia si sa le bage pe piata la pretul pe care-l considera “corect” pentru ca afacerea sa mearga constant in profit bun.
Cei care-si permit sa cumpere putinele produse de larg consum facute in vest sunt probabil sub 5% din populatie.
Pe de alta parte, boicotul la nivel national sau politic e o prostie pana nu ai mijloace sa inhibezi consumul si sa faci acele produse.
Cu ce sa faci?
Nu mai aduci maruntisuri, dar ca sa faci tu iti trebuie materie prima, pe care in buna parte tot cu vaporul o aduci, ceea ce e mai  putin eficient decat sa aduci produs finit.
Ai f-t relatiile cu Rusia, bagi strambe chinezilor si altor state care nu-ti plac, atunci du-te si cauta resurse la Polu Nord sau pe Marte, dar si acolo dai tot de rusi sau chinezi, ca Bruxellesul e prea adancit in a baga in cap cetatenilor egalitatea de gen ca sa mai aibe timp de economie.

Cum aa dezavantajeze importurile? Voi contraziceți exconomia de baza acum. Numai Ceaușescu voia sa crească banane in Bărăgan dar ăla avea 4 clase și oiiitjca lui a dus țara in faliment.

Asta ce intrebare incuietoare mai e? Iti spune ceva bilantul economic de schimburi comerciale?

Y = C + I + G + (X − M)
Here is a description of each GDP component:
C (consumption) is normally the largest GDP component in the economy, consisting of private expenditures in the economy (household final consumption expenditure). These personal expenditures fall under one of the following categories: durable goods, nondurable goods, and services. Examples include food, rent, jewelry, gasoline, and medical expenses, but not the purchase of new housing.
I (investment) includes, for instance, business investment in equipment, but does not include exchanges of existing assets. Examples include the construction of a new mine, the purchase of software, or the purchase of machinery and equipment for a factory. Spending by households (not the government) on new houses is also included in investment. In contrast to its colloquial meaning, "investment" in GDP does not mean purchases of financial products. Buying financial products is classed as 'saving', as opposed to investment. This avoids double-counting: if one buys shares in a company, and the company uses the money received to buy plant, equipment, etc., the amount will be counted toward GDP when the company spends the money on those things; to also count it when one gives it to the company would be to count two times an amount that only corresponds to one group of products. Buying bonds or companies' equity shares is a swapping of deeds, a transfer of claims on future production, not directly an expenditure on products; buying an existing building will involve a positive investment by the buyer and a negative investment by the seller, netting to zero overall investment.
G (government spending) is the sum of government expenditures on final goods and services. It includes salaries of public servants, purchases of weapons for the military and any investment expenditure by a government. It does not include any transfer payments, such as social security or unemployment benefits. Analyses outside the US will often treat government investment as part of investment rather than government spending.
X (exports) represents gross exports. GDP captures the amount a country produces, including goods and services produced for other nations' consumption, therefore exports are added.
M (imports) represents gross imports. Imports are subtracted since imported goods will be included in the terms G, I, or C, and must be deducted to avoid counting foreign supply as domestic.
C, I, and G are expenditures on final goods and services; expenditures on intermediate goods and services do not count. (Intermediate goods and services are those used by businesses to produce other goods and services within the accounting year.[24]) So for example if a car manufacturer buys auto parts, assembles the car and sells it, only the final car sold is counted towards the GDP. Meanwhile, if a person buys replacement auto parts to install them on their car, those are counted towards the GDP.

COP28 — the annual United Nations climate festival — opens Thursday with a gala dinner, the carbon footprint of which might rival the daily production of this week’s newest coal-fired plant in China.
No other place on the planet has done more to reduce temperatures than the United Arab Emirates. The Emirates have air conditioned the desert. It’s climate change of a sort.

One document included the interesting detail that Abu Dhabi’s national oil company was proposing to broker a deal to sell Canadian liquefied natural gas to China. That might explain why Prime Minister Justin Trudeau refused to sell Canadian natural gas to Germany. Why sell to German allies in the open when you can sell secretly to Chinese communists under the cover of the desert night?

Sa tii Conferinta despre climat intr-o tara petroliera, conferinta prezidata de seful unei mari companii petroliere necesita o mare doza de nesimtire.
70.000 de mari ipocrtiti producatori de carbon zburand catre o gigantica conferinta cu aer conditionat in desert, incercand sa scape lumea de camionete...
Caviar, sampanie, distractii in camere de 6000 dolari/noapte....

Sa tii Conferinta despre climat intr-o tara petroliera, conferinta prezidata de seful unei mari companii petroliere necesita o mare doza de nesimtire.
70.000 de mari ipocrtiti producatori de carbon zburand catre o gigantica conferinta cu aer conditionat in desert, incercand sa scape lumea de camionete...
Caviar, sampanie, distractii in camere de 6000 dolari/noapte....


Despre amprenta de carbon a acestei imbecile adunari ce sa mai vorbim. Toate pentru un raport de 3 pagini de care vor uita toti, asa cum au facut si in anii trecuti.

Chestia, descoperita de BBC e ca cu aceasta ocazie se pregateasc intalniri intre petrolisti si semnat contracte.



https://nationalpost...ditioned-desert

Până la diverse teorii mai mult sau mai puțin conspiraționiste, cifrele de mai jos prezintă situația reală și obiectivul pentru viitor.

România are o amprentă medie de 4,1 t CO₂ eq/an.

Cu obiectivul de mai jos cred că se poate gândi fiecare de unde și ce se va „tăia”.

.

2021 Report
The world will most likely reach 1.5 deg;C (2.7 deg F) global warming in the period 2021–2040 (we reached 1.1 deg;C/2 deg;F already in the last decade). But unless there are rapid, strong and sustained reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, limiting warming to 1.5 deg ;C (2.7 deg;F) or even 2 deg;C (3.6 deg F) will be impossible.

Confruntat cu criticile cum ca taie din avantul antreprenoilor in industria verde,
2023 Report zice:
The IPCC finds that there is a more than 50% chance that global temperature rise will reach or surpass 1.5 degrees C (2.7 degrees F) between 2021 and 2040 across studied scenarios, and under a high-emissions pathway, specifically, the world may hit this threshold even sooner — between 2018 and 2037.

Cop28 president says there is ‘no science’ behind demands for phase-out of fossil fuels

Exclusive: UAE’s Sultan Al Jaber says phase-out of coal, oil and gas would take world ‘back into caves’
That's exactly what we have been saying didnt need to fly private to COP28 to hear the truth.