Marci consacrate vs chinezarii
Last Updated: Jul 30 2014 15:04, Started by
Bursul
, May 31 2014 16:46
·
0
#1
Posted 31 May 2014 - 16:46
Si cand ma refer la marci consacrate: Samsung, HTC, Motorola, Nokia, IPhone
Chinezarii: Doogee, Xiaomi si alte nume din astea ca nu ma pricep la ele. In ce conditii (in afara de bani si ca "asa vor muschii mei") merita sa-ti iei un Samsung Galaxy sau un IPhone? Avand in vedere ca exista telefoane chinezesti cu procesor cu opt nuclee si sunt si mai ieftine mai merita sa dai dublu / triplu pe un HTC? Nefiind in domeniu, luati-ma usor |
#2
Posted 31 May 2014 - 16:54
In conditiile in care vrei sa aiba materiale de calitate, design placut si suport din partea comunitatii.
|
#3
Posted 31 May 2014 - 16:56
Pe (foarte) scurt: acele 8 nuclee de la o chinezărie nu echivalează cu un dual-core / quad-core consacrat.
Ansamblul în sine este inferior. |
#5
Posted 31 May 2014 - 17:01
Gresiti, materialele sunt de exceptie, sunt si cu carcase full metal sau gorilla glass 3.
Au SAR prea mare sau deloc testate. |
#6
Posted 31 May 2014 - 17:02
#7
Posted 31 May 2014 - 17:11
La chinezarii exista mitul ca dupa o saptamana s-ar putea sa nu mai functioneze.
|
#8
Posted 31 May 2014 - 17:12
Orice telefon poate sa nu mai functioneze brusc. La chinezarii ai garantie.
|
#9
Posted 31 May 2014 - 17:13
Am avut discutii pe tema asta. Cica asa s-a intamplat.
Stie careva ce telefon e cel din stanga? [ https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/uDt7gpuRNFc?feature=oembed - Pentru incarcare in pagina (embed) Click aici ] |
#10
Posted 31 May 2014 - 17:14
|
#12
Posted 31 May 2014 - 17:19
namespace, on 31 mai 2014 - 16:56, said:
Pe (foarte) scurt: acele 8 nuclee de la o chinezărie nu echivalează cu un dual-core / quad-core consacrat. Ansamblul în sine este inferior. eu stiu ca-s fix aceleasi chipuri. toate is produse in china. marcile consacrate fac control de calitate mai bun, carcasa, sticla etc sunt superioare |
#13
Posted 31 May 2014 - 17:19
namespace, on 31 mai 2014 - 16:56, said:
Pe (foarte) scurt: acele 8 nuclee de la o chinezărie nu echivalează cu un dual-core / quad-core consacrat. Ansamblul în sine este inferior. Ideea e ca as dori si niste dovezi. Ca asa se zice prin targ, nu prea merge. Daca ai ceva ce sa-mi recomanzi sa citesc sau chiar sa-mi dai mura in gura (deh, n-am de timp) ti-as fi recunoscator. _Smiley_, on 31 mai 2014 - 17:14, said:
se vede ca nu te pricepi. Xiaomi e marca cu traditie. Xiaomi was co-founded by seven partners on June 6, 2010. In the first round of funding, institutional investors included Temasek, a Singaporean government-owned investment vehicle, the Chinese venture capital funds IDG Capital and Qiming Venture Partners,[17] and mobile processor developer Qualcomm.[18] Ce inseamna la tine traditie? Edited by Bursul, 31 May 2014 - 17:21. |
#14
Posted 31 May 2014 - 17:21
#15
Posted 31 May 2014 - 17:21
|
#16
Posted 31 May 2014 - 17:24
When speaking about Chinese smartphones, we ought to mention MediaTek. Most Chinese smartphones (even top-tier ones) are powered by a cheap piece of MediaTek silicon, which is offered at competitive prices. However, whether for lack of optimization or something else, it’s often simply too slow. The problem is painfully apparent on top-notch Chinese devices with a 1080 x 1920-pixel screens using a chip like the MT6589T (a popular chip). Such devices are supposed to deliver the best of Android, but what often happens instead is that the chip is simply not capable to keep up with the high resolution. The result? Painful lag. Are you willing to tolerate that constant slowdown every time you use your phone? We know we aren’t.
Și de asta zic că un octa-core chinezesc e apă de ploaie: Moreover, while Western chip makers like Qualcomm, Apple and Nvidia are doing their best to improve per core performance, MediaTek is looking for quick fame with largely unjustified decisions like going octa-core. Most apps are even barely optimized for two cores, so an octa-core chip looks rushed at best. - http://www.phonearen...-clones_id49599 Edited by namespace, 31 May 2014 - 17:33. |
#17
Posted 31 May 2014 - 17:31
1. Interfete de prost gust aplicate peste Android (bine aici se incadreaza si TouchWiz)
2. Nu ai garantia macar a unui update oficial catre o vesiune superioara de Android. 3. Controlul de calitate si componente alese mai cu grija la producatorii cu traditie. 4. Designul si finisajele se vad ca sunt de chinezarii: design-uri neinspirate sau tip clona (imitaii de iPhone, Galaxy etc.), plastic glossy folosit in abundenta, suprafete vopsite care ulterior se cojesc (gen L-uri de la LG) etc. Oricat de bine ar fi finisate, nu au alura acela de premium, de original, iti dai seama ca e lucru chinezesc dintr-o privire. Valabil si la masini si la orice lucru. 5. Brand. Una e sa ai in buzunar un Nokia, un Moto, un HTC si alta e sa ai Xiaomi, ZTE, Huawei...nu stiu e ca si cum ai compara un Mercedes sau un Audi cu o Lancia. E vorba de istorie, de traditie, de greutatea brandului. Pentru mine astea sunt principalele motive. Multi le pot trece cu vederea usor, eu nu. Niciodata nu imi voi cumpara o chinezarie. Prefer sa am un aparat de brand cu specificatii mai normale si mai scump decat un chinezism cu specificatii top end la acelasi pret. Si prin chinezarie se intelege lucru conceput si executat total in China, nu doar asamblat sau ambalat in China, pentru si dupa cerintele unui brand cu traditie. Edited by antinVidia, 31 May 2014 - 17:33. |
#18
Posted 31 May 2014 - 17:41
namespace, on 31 mai 2014 - 17:24, said:
When speaking about Chinese smartphones, we ought to mention MediaTek. Most Chinese smartphones (even top-tier ones) are powered by a cheap piece of MediaTek silicon, which is offered at competitive prices. However, whether for lack of optimization or something else, it’s often simply too slow. The problem is painfully apparent on top-notch Chinese devices with a 1080 x 1920-pixel screens using a chip like the MT6589T (a popular chip). Such devices are supposed to deliver the best of Android, but what often happens instead is that the chip is simply not capable to keep up with the high resolution. The result? Painful lag. Are you willing to tolerate that constant slowdown every time you use your phone? We know we aren’t. Și de asta zic că un octa-core chinezesc e apă de ploaie: Moreover, while Western chip makers like Qualcomm, Apple and Nvidia are doing their best to improve per core performance, MediaTek is looking for quick fame with largely unjustified decisions like going octa-core. Most apps are even barely optimized for two cores, so an octa-core chip looks rushed at best. - http://www.phonearen...-clones_id49599 |
Anunturi
Bun venit pe Forumul Softpedia!
▶ 0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users