NATO - Articolul 5

Totul este propaganda aztazi, prea putini sunt constienti cat de adanc sunt influentati.


Pe mine ma deranjeaza cel mai mult cand vad cu cata usurinta adopta unii tot ceea ce se spune oficial.

Dormiti linistiti, articolul 5 vegheaza pentru voi.

Pentru îngrijorații care cred că trec lunile până vin trupele Nato în ajutor

Orice mișcare de trupe orcesti care granița noastră într-un scenariu apocaliptic, va fi văzut din timp. Suficient timp încât trupe aliate să pornească și să ajungă la Galați.

Nu va îngrijorați.

Application of article 5 on a case-by-case basis

Turning back to the 2021 Brussels Summit, where it was agreed that application of article 5 would be considered on a case-by-case basis by the North Atlantic Council, it is important to consider that all NATO decisions are made by consensus. This means that every agreement is reached by common consent, or in other words, that there is no voting. During this proceeding, consultations take place until a decision that is acceptable to all members is reached. [b] In the case of an attack against an allied satellite this would signify that decision towards the application of article 5 of the Washington Treaty would have to wait until a consensus among all the 31 NATO Allies is reached. [\b] Taking into consideration the undefined terms of outer space attacks, this might happen rapidly or extend over time, which would affect an imminent response by Allies if required, or not happen at all.

Noa, bine sefu', cat timp au facut militarii de la Milan pana in Romania? (n-am gasit informatia in cele doua articole postate de tine)

Tine cont, eu de la Onesti la Brescia am facut cam o zi, dar am mers pe autostrada, prin Austria.

Noa, bine sefu', cat timp au facut militarii de la Milan pana in Romania? (n-am gasit informatia in cele doua articole postate de tine)

Tine cont, eu de la Onesti la Brescia am facut cam o zi, dar am mers pe autostrada, prin Austria.

Background
Article 5 of the 1949 North Atlantic Treaty is considered
the cornerstone of the NATO Alliance, embodying its
'one for all, and all for one' spirit. When one of the 30
(soon to be 32) NATO members falls victim to an armed
attack, all other members must come to that state's
assistance. This assistance may include the use of armed
force. When the treaty was negotiated, in 1948 and
1949, the western European nations favoured an article
implying an automatic and unqualified commitment of
the US to defend Europe. The US, however, feared that
such a strong wording would automatically engage
them in European wars, something Congress did not
want to accept. The negotiations ended in a
compromise: the security guarantee was laid down in a
formal treaty (a European demand), but embedded in an
Article 5 formulation that does not imply automatic US
involvement in an armed conflict (an American
demand), and is strengthened by Article 11. Sixty years
later, Article 42(7) was incorporated in the Treaty on
European Union (TEU) as the EU's 'mutual defence
clause', part of a cluster of articles relating to the 'progressive framing of a common Union defence policy'.
Substantial uncertainty remains over the interpretation of Article 42(7). Following its first and only
invocation in 2015, after the November terrorist attacks in Paris, debate intensified on how it works in
practice, its scope, the definitions of 'armed aggression' and 'territory', and which forms of aggression it
applies to (e.g. whether those include hybrid threats). Experts note that Article 42(7) 'leaves more room for
interpretation than one might expect from a clause in a legally binding text'. Many experts hoped that the
Strategic Compass would deliver clarification, however that did not occur

Jumătate de an, scrie în articol
Păi au făcut vreo zece zile, cel mai probabil. Venind din Italia. În situație de război sigur nu fac nici atât, sunt prioritari, se blochează tot ca să le facă loc, nu mai stau la granițe, semafoare, ambuteiaje. Dacă veneau din Bulgaria, Grecia, Polonia sau Turcia probabil făceau vreo două trei zile. Aviația vine în câteva ore. Între timp rușii ăia rupți în fund trebuie să inventeze teleportarea, să ne trezim cu ei direct la graniță

Asta macar pana se pun de acord aliatii asupra ajutorului, care pana la urma poate fi fara forte militare.

oare se poate folosi art 5 ca să atacam Rusia preventiv?  E.g. dacă muta putler tancuri către tarile baltice sau Finlanda

oare se poate folosi art 5 ca să atacam Rusia preventiv?  E.g. dacă muta putler tancuri către tarile baltice sau Finlanda