Citate din Talmud

1. te gandeai aiurea. produc destul in plictiseala mea incat sa-mi permit traiul in bucuresti si sa-mi aleg independent de succesiuni retragerea in romania pitoreasca.
2. te rog. deja ai trecut de partea motivationala a interviului pentru angajare.

N-am de gand sa te inlocuiesc in postul de babysitter si nici in cel de gospodina plictisita si nesuferita.

Acest  călugăr a fost un mozaic.A trecut la creştinism şi s-a călugărit.E foarte clar că omul ştie despre ce vorbeşte pt că a fost evreu.Desigur indivizii fără caracter îl vor contrazice şi pe acest călugăr fost evreu.Ia, uite ce frumos spune d-lui.
Lincul e pus pt ne-evrei.Evreii  desigur nu vor să vadă un fost evreu care a lepădat mozaismul, a luat creştinismul, mai vorbeşte şi contra evreilor. S-a mai şi călugărit! Chiar nu suportă aşa ceva evreii.

draga mea, partile placute le pastrez pentru mine. vezi ca nu stii daca n-ai copii? cu gospodaria stau bine. cate-un sote, cate-un gratar. am ajutoare devotate si pricepute. dar la job niste experti in office mi-ar prinde bine. nu cer vocabular diversificat. de-aia consideram ca te incadrezi. scuze ca te-am inoportunat cu oferta. dar nu-i nimic, piata-i plina de cereri. unii chiar vor sa raman in bucuresti, observ.

Noapte bună, pe mîine!

Incearca sa nu te flatezi de una singura. Daca ai invatat sa lucrezi si in excel asta nu inseamna ca vei fi avansata la postul de secretara de la ajutor de secretara.

well, tatae..am mai adus eu o carte a unui calugar ortodox ca dovada. se numea ceva cu infruntarea jidovilor. si o scrisese neofit cavsocalvitiu. dar toti de pe aici, in frunte cu megs mi-au refuzat referintele. au zis ca un evreu nu poate fi crezut nici de trece la crestinism. discuta cu ei, poate isi revizuiesc parerea.

ai dreptate. am toate atuurile sa raman pe postul de manager. munca-i pentru fraieri. in general pentru cei care stau cu chirie.

Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Sanhedrin

Folio 59a
But the precept of observing social laws is a positive one, yet it is reckoned? — It is both positive and negative.¹
R. Johanan said: A heathen who studies the Torah deserves death, for it is written, Moses commanded us a law for an inheritance;² it is our inheritance, not theirs.³ Then why is this not included in the Noachian laws? — On the reading morasha [an inheritance] he steals it; on the reading me'orasah [betrothed], he is guilty as one who violates a betrothed maiden, who is stoned.⁴ An objection is raised: R. Meir used to say. Whence do we know that even a heathen who studies the Torah is as a High Priest? From the verse, [Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments:] which, if man do, he shall live in them.⁵ Priests, Levites, and Israelites are not mentioned, but men: hence thou mayest learn that even a heathen who studies⁶ the Torah is as a High Priest! — That refers to their own seven laws.⁷
'R Hanania b. Gamaliel said: [They were also commanded] not to partake of the blood drawn from a living animal.'
Our Rabbis taught: But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat,⁸ this prohibits flesh cut from the living animal. R. Hanina b. Gamaliel said: It also prohibits blood drawn from a living animal. What is his reason? — He reads the verse thus: flesh with the life thereof [shall ye not eat]: blood with the life thereof shall ye not eat. But the Rabbis maintain that this reading teaches that flesh cut from live reptiles is permitted.⁹ Similarly it is said, Only be sure that thou eat not the blood: for the blood is the life,' and thou mayest not eat the life with the flesh.¹⁰ But the Rabbis maintain that the verse teaches that the blood of arteries, with which life goes out, [is also forbidden as blood].¹¹
Why was it first enjoined upon the sons of Noah, and then repeated at Sinai? — As the dictum, of R. Jose b. Hanina. For R. Jose b. Hanina said: Every precept which was given to the sons of Noah and repeated at Sinai was meant for both [heathens and Israelites]; that which was given to the sons of Noah but not repeated at Sinai was meant for the Israelites, but not for the heathens. Now, the only law thus commanded to the children of Noah and not repeated at Sinai was the prohibition of the sinew that shrank [nervous ischiadicus], and in accordance with R. Judah's view.¹²
The Master said: 'Every precept which was given to the sons of Noah and repeated at Sinai was meant for both [Noachides and Israelites]'. On the contrary, since it was repeated at Sinai, should we not assume it to be meant for Israel only?¹³ — Since idolatry was repeated as Sinai, and we find that the Noachides were punished for practising it,¹⁴ we must conclude that it was meant for both.
'That which was given to the sons of Noah but not repeated at Sinai was meant for the Israelites, but not for the heathens.' On the contrary, since it was not repeated at Sinai, should we not assume that it was meant for the Noachides and not for Israel?¹⁵ — There is nothing permitted to an Israelite yet forbidden to a heathen. Is there not? But what of a beautiful woman?¹⁶ — There it is because the heathens were not authorised to conquer.¹⁷ But what of a thing worth less than a Perutah?¹⁸ — There it is because the heathens do not forgive.¹⁹
'Every precept which was given to the sons of Noah and repeated at Sinai was meant for both [Noachides and Israelites]'.

Resh Laḳish (d. 278) said, "A Gentile observing the Sabbath deserves death" (Sanh. 58b). This refers to a Gentile who accepted the seven laws of the Noachidæ, inasmuch as "the Sabbath is a sign between God and Israel alone," and it was probably directed against the Christian Jews, who disregarded the Mosaic laws and yet at that time kept up the observance of the Jewish Sabbath. Rabbina, who lived about 150 years after the Christians had changed the day of rest to Sunday, could not quite understand the principle underlying Resh Laḳish's law, and, commenting upon it, added: "not even on Mondays [is the Gentile allowed to rest]"; intimating that the mandate given to the Noachidæ that "day and night shall not cease" ([ http://d3sva65x0i5hnc.cloudfront.net/V05p623003.jpg - Pentru incarcare in pagina (embed) Click aici ]="have no rest ") should be taken in a literal sense (Gen. viii. 22)—probably to discourage general idleness (ib. Rashi), or for the more plausible reason advanced by Maimonides, who says: "The principle is, one is not permitted to make innovations in religion or to create new commandments. He has the privilege to become a true proselyte by accepting the whole Law" ("Yad," Melakim, x. 9). R. Emden ([ http://d3sva65x0i5hnc.cloudfront.net/V05p623004.jpg - Pentru incarcare in pagina (embed) Click aici ]), in a remarkable apology for Christianity contained in his appendix to "Seder 'Olam" (pp. 32b-34b, Hamburg, 1752), gives it as his opinion that the original intention of Jesus, and especially of Paul, was to convert only the Gentiles to the seven moral laws of Noah and to let the Jews follow the Mosaic law—which explains the apparent contradictions in the New Testament regarding the laws of Moses and the Sabbath.

1.tu nu ai adus nici o dovada si nici vreo contributie notabila la arie.
In afara de troll, spam si mistouri ieftine atunci cand nu faci concurs cu Sofica la jigniri si aruncat cu rahat, n-ai facut nimic.
2.Daca te doboara asa tare chiria, poate fac eu un pustiu de bine si iti inchiriez o locuinta mai ieftina.... in Bucuresti daca tot spuneai ca vrei sa stai aici definitiv

Daca e scrisa de Rambam, asta s-a nascut in Spania prin 1100 si ceva. Evreii cind au fost goniti?
Daca scrie in Talmud, acesta a fost scris dupa 70 en. Cind au fost goniti evreii?

1.ai dreptate. imi asum ca nu am cerut oricarui user sa dovedeasca diverse, orice. imi asum ca nu mi-am format o baza de date cu postarile altor useri. imi asum ca am folosit mai mult de 5 cuvinte pentru a caracteriza o postare care nu mi-e pe plac. imi asum ca nu am profitat niciodata de blandetea singurului user de pe acest forum care inca te mai considera umana, batandu-mi joc de el si de autoritatea lui in fata celorlalti si subminandu-i neutralitatea prin nesimtiri de gen "mi se cuvine, ca-s megs". imi asum ca nu am intrat in schimburi de replici atat de josnice incat centura si flora ei vaginala ar fi considerata elitista. imi asum ca-s mai putin megs si mai mult nazdaq in fiecare zi (iar familia mea e vesnic recunoscatoare pentru aceasta). merit tot ce poti tu sa-mi dai, inclusiv invidia si frustrarea pe care o risipesti aiurea pe forum pentru ca sunt tot ceea nu esti tu.
2. chiria nu ma doboara, c-o cheltuiesc pe chestii light. dar taxele pe venit, da. dar te poti consola ca la zalau chiriile-s mai mici.

s-acuma ies, ca nici n-am observat ca-i aproape unu. iar avantajele de a nu fi megs vin cu neajunsul trezirii la 5:30.

Pisa, de ce spun hahamii ca Cel ce citeşte Biblia, fără Mişna şi Ghemara, este ca şi cum n-ar avea Dumnezeu ?

Florica, la primul videoclip, pe la minutul 1:14, spune ca in Sanhedrin 59a scrie ca uciderea unor goyim este ca uciderea unor animale salbatice. Te rog sa-mi arati in text unde anume:   

  

Inca nu mi-ai spus unde este Choschen Ham.

In al doilea video, individul sustine ca in Talmud se spune nu stiu ce de ziua sfinta catolica. Iata tot pasajul care apare in video, in minutul 0:50:


Unde este denumita ziua sfinta catolica  "ziua raului"?

Individul pur si simplu minte, nicaieri in Talmud nu scrie ca "cei mai buni dintre crestini trebuie omoriti", am mai scris despre asta, nu e vorba de crestini ci de egipteni, si nu in Talmud. Pe scurt, gunoi.

Choschen Ham?

Nu ai cunostinte elementare de istorie a evreilor, dar pretinzi ca stii cum si ce gindesc. Bravo.

1. Degeaba te strofoci ca Sofica. Troll ai fost de la inceput, troll esti si acum... asta atunci cand nu faci misto ieftin sau jignesti ca la usa cortului.
Vreo contributie notabila la aceasta arie nu ai nicio macar in alea 1% mesaje ontopic caci 99% din ceea ce ai postat tu aici este complet offtopic.

2. Ca raman in Bucuresti sau ca ma intorc la Zalau, chiria nu ma va doboari fiindca in niciunul din aceste doua locuri nu e nevoie sa platesc chirie. Dar nu pot sa nu constat grija cu care imi citesti mesajele si imi porti de grija.

well, tatae..

Eu ți-am pus martori cum mi-ai pus și tu la holocaust.Acu ce vrei? Să îi analizez io pe martori? Ce, tu i-ai analizat pe martorii de la holocaust?Ce să-ți fac? Așa ai făcut, așa primești.
Ca să vadă cineva cum gîndesc eu nu trebuie să știe istoria românilor ci trebuie să mă analizeze doar pe mine.Ca să știe cineva cum gîndesc evreii de azi trebuie să îi analizeze pe ei, nu istoria lor.Te rog să îți faci singură o mică analiză ca să vezi ce prostioară ai spus.

aici nu ești la tine in  cartier ori la școală.Te prostești la bătrînețe cu...well, tatae..? Mie mi-ai lăsat o impresie deplorabilă.

M-am linistit, Daca ti-a facut tie o impresie deplorabila, inseamna ca n-am gresit cind am hotarit ca imi place.

Tocmai a crescut inca putin in ochii mei [ http://www.sherv.net/cm/emoticons/yes/nodding-yes-by-a-very-happy-smiley-emoticon.gif - Pentru incarcare in pagina (embed) Click aici ]

Choschen Ham???????????????