Tesla - informatii practice

Toate superchargerele din Norvegia au fost deschise și pt mașinile non Tesla.

Mda... m-am uitat în contul de Tesla și am văzut mare bucurie la EDD[...]

ca astia de la TR aduc masina doar cand expira nota de inscriere R+ (e valabila 300 de zile).

de ce? de unde stiai asta?
sper sa nu fie asa, ca am primit nota de inscriere acum 1 saptamana..nu mai pot sta 293 de zile, stau deja din NOV21.

Having been following the German forum (tff.de), the following has been confirmed with this batch of M3P's.
For those who have received VIN's / reconfirmed June delivery dates the cars will definitely have:
LG battery, 79Kwh (E5LD)
3D6 hairpin rear motor
This has been obtained from the COC's (certificate of conformity) which have been received by those in Germany who have VIN's for this batch of M3P's being shipped.
As previously discussed the LG battery offers less power (performance) than the Panasonic that's been used in the M3P up until this point.
The Panasonic puts out a capped 430kw total power from 70% to 100% SOC (hot battery, 50c). The LG puts out 390kw at 70% and peaks at 415kw at 100% SOC.
This effectively means maximum HP of the pan M3P is 576hp (70-100% SOC) and the LG M3P is 556HP (only at 100% SOC)
Both of these are on a hot battery temp of 50c, so best case scenario.
On a mid temp battery (30c), the disparity is reduced with 70%->100% SOC, resulting in 375->420KW (pan), and 365->405KW (LG)
The new higher output 3D6 motor offers no effective extra performance (as it's entirely battery limited), although it is slightly more efficient and gives better range in urban driving WLTP than previous model. Combined range is still lower on WLTP, due to slightly less battery capacity (79kwh vs 82kwh)
It's not all bad for the LG battery though - it appears to have less degradation than the Panasonic, at the very least it is much more stable and consistent on the BMS estimated range vs SOC. Tests at 10K km on a MYP with pan E3LD vs LG E5LD (same battery as now in M3P) show the estimated range has barely changed from new where as the Pan as dropped considerably....the Panasonic needs more 100% balancing charges to keep the total available capacity in check where the LG doesn't really care. Results are showing the LG as effectively ending up with same or slightly more effective capacity / real world range than the Panasonic after 10K km run in.
The LG is better (more output power available) at low SOC's (below 20%), especially when cold. The LG also has higher regen (85kw vs 75kw) and is more consistent with the regen power level.