Neurochirurgie minim invazivă
"Primum non nocere" este ideea ce a deschis drumul medicinei spre minim invaziv. Avansul tehnologic extraordinar din ultimele decenii a permis dezvoltarea tuturor domeniilor medicinei. Microscopul operator, neuronavigația, tehnicile anestezice avansate permit intervenții chirurgicale tot mai precise, tot mai sigure. Neurochirurgia minim invazivă, sau prin "gaura cheii", oferă pacienților posibilitatea de a se opera cu riscuri minime, fie ele neurologice, infecțioase, medicale sau estetice. www.neurohope.ro |
Complex LILO problem
Last Updated: Mar 21 2003 13:54, Started by
bobo
, Jan 18 2003 22:17
·
0
#1
Posted 18 January 2003 - 22:17
Hi!
I have an AMD ATHLON XP 1700+ with 256SDRAM and Seagate Barracuda 40 GB HDD. My PriMaster is the Cd-Rom and the PriSlave is the HDD. After i bought the computer, i installed Win98. After a few month i installed RadHat 7.2 from a Cd, on a partition of 3GB ( /dev/hdb5 and /dev/hdb2 swap) at the end of the harddisk! Everything went fine... I thought it's time to install Windows2000, but first i wanted to check if lilo works fine. Because i heared the win2000 will overwrite the Lilo, MBR, ... I looked at the /etc/lilo.conf and the file was good generated. ( i checked the partitions with fdisk /dev/hdb ): prompt timeout=50 default=DOS boot=/dev/hdb map=/boot/map install=/boot/boot.b message=/bot/message lba32 image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.7-10 label=linux initrd=/boot/initrd-2.4.7-10.img root=/dev/hdb5 other=/dev/hdb1 optional label=DOS So, i gived the lilo command and the result was: Warning: /dev/hdb is not on the first disk Added linux Added DOS I gived the reboot command and after 'Boot record found on IDE-0' apears only the L letter. How can i solve the problem? Thanks for your answer! |
#2
Posted 20 January 2003 - 23:19
I think your IDE-0 is your CDROM. Try to boot from IDE-1 (search your BIOS Setup for this one).
Good Luck! |
#3
Posted 04 February 2003 - 11:19
You either have to move cd-rom on the second ide, or to make cd-rom slave and hdd master. In either cases it will work as you want.
|
#4
Posted 21 March 2003 - 13:54
1st: Windows 2000/xp will never overwrite your MBR no matter what. If it does make changes, it will only modify your partition table to make it's partition active or to register a new partition created during setup, but it will not touch the MBR code (loader). This is not the case for 95/98/me. They will overwrite your MBR code before first restart during setup, doing a fdisk /mbr.
2nd: If you don't succed with LILO, try GRUB instead: http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/ |
Anunturi
▶ 0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users