Sclavia sexuala in Islam

From popular Islamic websites today:

“Islam ensured that the slave girl’s duties were not restricted merely to domestic chores but also gave her master permission to copulate with her. This concession created an atmosphere of love and harmony between the slave girl and her master. Islam thereby raised the status of the war captive-maidens close to that of wives. It was a psychological cure to her grief-stricken heart, being deprived of her family and thrown into the hands of a strange society.” (1) cata generozitate!
http://www.islam.tc/...view.php?q=5482

A similar popular website, Islam Q & A, reviews several Islamic scholarly opinions and concludes:

“The Book of Allaah indicates that the sexual relationships that are permitted are only of two types, either marriage or those (women slaves) whom one’s right hand possesses.
Al-Umm, 5/43.

“The wife has no right to object to her husband owning female slaves or to his having intercourse with them.
And Allaah knows best.”
http://63.175.194.25...=eng&QR=1038


(Sahih Muslim) “Chapter 29: IT IS PERMISSIBLE TO HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH A CAPTIVE WOMAN AFTER SHE IS PURIFIED (OF MENSES OR DELIVERY) IN CASE SHE HAS A HUSBAND, HER MARRIAGE IS ABROGATED AFTER SHE BECOMES CAPTIVE”

Sahih Muslim, Book 8, Number 3432 (also 3433, 3434):
Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: “And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)” (i. e. they were lawful for them when their ‘Idda period came to an end).

Sunan Abu Dawud, Volume 2, Number 2150:
“Abu Said al-Khudri said: “The apostle of Allah sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the apostle of Allah were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Quranic verse, “And all married women (are forbidden) unto your save those (captives) whom your right hand possesses”. That is to say, they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period.””

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 34, Number 432:
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:
that while he was sitting with Allah’s Apostle he said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.

Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Number 3371 (3371-3388):
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

Malik’s Muwatta, Book 29, Number 29.32.95:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Rabia ibn Abi Abd ar-Rahman from Muhammad ibn Yahya ibn Habban that Ibn Muhayriz said, “I went into the mosque and saw Abu Said al-Khudri and so I sat by him and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Said al-Khudri said, ‘We went out with the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, on the expedition to the Banu al-Mustaliq. We took some Arabs prisoner, and we desired the women as celibacy was hard for us. We wanted the ransom, so we wanted to practise coitus interruptus. We said, ‘Shall we practise coitus interruptus while the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, is among us before we ask him?’ We asked him about that and he said, ‘You don’t have to not do it. There is no self which is to come into existence up to the Day of Rising but that it will come into existence.’ “

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 637:
Narrated Buraida: “The Prophet sent ‘Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and I hated Ali, and ‘Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus). I said to Khalid, “Don’t you see this (i.e. Ali)?” When we reached the Prophet I mentioned that to him. He said, “O Buraida! Do you hate Ali?” I said, “Yes.” He said, “Do you hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumus.””

Canadians who are reading this story should send this headline and link around widely to news media outlets, politicians, etc. Rape of non-Muslim female captives should be shown as yet another one of those atrocious policies of Islamic law that has outraged even the media and politicians in Canada over the past week.

Islam permits rape and forced impregnation of non-Muslim female captives. According to the sahih Hadith of Bukhari and Muslim, when Muslims were raping female captives, they asked Muhammad whether or not they should also perform coitus interruptus, and he is reported to have said either that it doesn’t matter or that he preferred they didn’t do coitus interruptus. That is, he preferred that they not do it, because it is Allah’s will whether or not a baby would be born, and that they “could not turn it away.” (Muhammad’s preferred option of not using coitus interruptus would obviously lead to forced impregnation, or as Muhammad claimed, impregnation by Allah’s will. The Quran states that Allah controls birth rates, women’s wombs, and whether or not a baby will be conceived and born). Some of the Muslims wanted to practice coitus interruptus because they wanted to sell the women they had captured, and pregnant women captives (as per Islamic law) could not be sold until after the baby had been born.

The basis for rape of non-Muslim female captives comes from the Quran (23:5-6, 33:50-52, 4:24, 70:29-30; also see mainstream commentaries by Ibn Kathir, Al-Jalalayn, Ibn Abbas, et al.), the Hadith, the Sira, Muhammad’s example conduct (see Quran 33:21) and the conduct of the male Companions (e.g., Khalid bin Walid, Ali, et al.), and mainstream Islamic law. Muslim males have been raping non-Muslim female captives with the approval of Islamic doctrine for the past approximately 1400 years, and this practice continues throughout the world today, wherever Muslim populations come into contact with non-Muslim populations.

From Tabari, and example of rape and forced impregnation:

(Tabari IX:25): “By Allah, I did not come to Fight for nothing. I wanted a victory over Ta’if so that I might obtain a slave girl from them and make her pregnant.”

http://sheikyermami....nadian-captive/

ce să-ți spun, niște distruși la cap reciclează textele unor cretini scrise acu nuș câți ani. mare șmecherie.

cine steți voi, păcătoșilor să vă puneți contra voinței lui alah mărețu? aaaa?

Misto religie. Dar mai misto este asta a noastra, in care barbatul in sinea lui conduce lumea.

Musulmanii sunt niste primate mizerabile, si-au pierdut orice urma de umanitate !  

Sclavia sexuala este doar una din abominatiile islamice...merita mentionata si mutilarea genitala (97% din femeile din Egipt au suferit o 'operatie' de îndepartare a clitorisului), crimele de onoare, mutilarea cu acid, etc. !  

http://www.semneleti...te-OK-3790.html - Politiciană din Kuweit: sclavia sexuală este OK

Femeile au fost complet lobotomizate, au devenit doar niste vaci demente, pt. ele supunerea absoluta reprezinta o valoare...  

In Arabia Saudita, femeia violata este aspru pedepsita pentru ca se considera ca ea a instigat barbatul la un asemenea fapt, prin hainele pe care le poarta.  

http://www.libertate...ata-229726.html - Condamnată la închisoare și biciuire pentru că a fost violată
O tânără de 23 de ani din Arabia Saudită a fost condamnată la un an de închisoare și 100 de lovituri de bici după ce a fost violată de cinci bărbați și a rămas însărcinată. Tânăra femeie a fost condamnată de adulter pentru că a urcat în mașina unuia dintre agresori care a dus-o într-o casă unde a violat-o împreună cu alți patru prieteni.

sunteți niște răuvoitoare. prea cinstitele femei musulmane sunt devotate soților lor, și-i iubesc și le toarnă plozi, și sunt mândre și fericite de realizările lor. invidioaselor

gigel de hohențolărn, on 20th August 2011, 14:20, said:

Selam ar fi aderat cu toata fiinta lui la aceasta postare...noroc ca tu esti doar sarcastic !  

Thomas - Femeie, încă nu te-ai prins că bărbatului nu îi place să citească mult, apoi ăștia cu Islamul bănuiesc că este ceva care majoritatea considerăm pozitiv, adică bărbatul cu decizie totală asupra femei de lângă ei.
Cea ce îmi pare corect, femeia are dreptul doar la un bărbat, bărbatul poate să mai aducă 1-2-3-4-5 pe lângă, femeia se mai îngrașă, gravitația mai trage țațele, curul, munca la bucătărie își spune cuvântul, adică motive întemeiate pentru care este normal/firesc că ai nevoie de o femeie nouă la fiecare 5-6 ani.

Aether, on 21st August 2011, 18:50, said:

iar bărbatu are nevoie la fiecare 3-4 ani de o oglindă mai performanta ca să-și străvază și domnia sa membrul, mascat de stimabila-i burtoacă

Pai si femeia trebuie sa-i schimbe la 2,3 ani,

Aether, on 21st August 2011, 19:50, said:

AIURÍSTIC, -Ă, aiuristici, -ce, adj., s. f. 1. Adj. (Despre procedee metodologice) Care e intrinsec gandirii lui Aether.

Edited by searcher-star, 22 August 2011 - 09:35.

hai bre, da pentru dreptul bărbatului de-a-și bate femeia nu zice nimeni nimic? ce naiba, păi or suntem pe aria de islam or nu mai suntem

Poate mai exact sclavia non sexuala. Despre ce viata intima se poate vb. intr-o familie cu 4 neveste ???? O data pe luna ca asa zice in coran ??????????? Sa fim seriosi. Si de cele mai multe ori el este la adanci batraneti ca atunci are bani de a 4-a. Pe bune ca ar trebui eliberate aceste fiinte de sub sclavie reala. IN secolul asta nu ar mai trebui admisa sclavia. Este scandalos ca asa zisele puteri stau si se uita. Atrocitatile islamului trebuie condamnate ca ale tuturor regimurilor de teroare si desfiintate. Chiar daca teroarea se manifeste doar unisex in cazul ismaului, tot regim criminal este iar omul trebuie sa fie mai presus de stat sau de regim.

Edited by orlandosorin, 17 September 2011 - 02:03.

SophistiKat, on 20th August 2011, 12:56, said:

Chiar nu ma pot abtine sa iti zic ca nu am mai vazut pe cineva atat de rasist si cu atata ura in el, in viata mea.In plus, mai scoti si niste minciuni de ...
97% femei circumcise??? WTF???

orlandosorin, on 17th September 2011, 03:02, said:

Pai la ortodocsi e tot asa ,au neveste nelegitime cate vor muschii lor ,iar nevasta legitima asteapta acasa si se uita pe geam cand vine sotul de la amante .Chiar popii au mai multe amante ce e la moda .Fiecare sa-si vada de barna lui ...

arakosta, on 17th September 2011, 17:45, said:

[ http://www.childinfo.org/images/fgmc_progress_2010_4.JPG - Pentru incarcare in pagina (embed) Click aici ]

Official Egyptian statistics say 97 percent of women aged 15 to 49, Christians and Muslims alike, have undergone what the UN prefers to call female genital mutilation, or FGM.


Si vezi ca "musulman" nu desemneaza o rasa ci o religie la fel cum nici crestin sau hindus nu desemneaza o rasa.

Limba Romană este banală, să nu vă folosiți de ea, să stau eu bătrân să nu înțeleg engleza voastră.
Care ar trebui să fie rostul la FGM asta, am citit/văzut despre el, dar nu am văzut nimica trecut despre motivul pentru care este făcut.

FGM- female genital mutilation- circumcizia feminina este o practica preislamica raspandita in zona Arabiei si bazinul Nilului (de unde a fost probabil importata) ce consta in indepartarea clitorisului si labiilor prin taiere.
Nu cunosc semnificatia acestui ritual in populatiile preislamica din Africa sau Arabia dar in islam a fost considerat un obicei care desi nu e obigatoriu (precum circumcizia masculina) este de incurajat. Baza scripturala pentru acest obicei o constituie un hadith (o consemnare a faptelor si vorbelor lui Mohamed care nu sunt considerate revelatii divine) din colectia Abu Dawud care spune asa:

"Povestit de  Umm Atiyyah al Ansariyyah: o femeie obisnuia sa faca circumcizii in Medina. Profetul i-a spus: nu taia prea adanc pentru ca asa e mai bine pentru femeie si mai de dorit pentru barbat."

Per se, FGM nu are o semnificatie religioasa precum circumcizia masculina (emulatia omului perfect-Mohamed, care s-a nascut fara preput) dar in timp de circumcizia feminina s-a legat ideea de puritate, o femeie circumcisa fiind considerata pura.

In radul teologilor musulmani parerile sunt impartite, unii o considera o practica de nedorit iar altii o considera o practica recomandabila desi nu obligatorie. Foarte putini o considera obligatorie.

arakosta, on 17th September 2011, 17:45, said:

Ma islamofilule ignorant, tu-mi provoci la fel de multa scârba ca musulmanii !  

Si nu confunda islamofobia, o reactia absolut normala în fata primitivismului islamic, cu rasismul.  

Hai, muta-te dracului în Arabia Saudita !  

Edited by SophistiKat, 17 September 2011 - 21:19.