Decizie CEDO în cazul „Pârvu contra României”: Daune morale 65.000 euro

Conspiratii,milioane de euro despagubiri ....aloooo ce se intampla?


De ce ,avea legaturi cu interlopii?

Sa zicem ca nu esti chiar cel mai ager.
Daca te urmaresc unii in civil, cu arme, nu incerci sa scapi? Stai sa vina la tine ca sa vezi ce o sa faca cu armele alea? Trebuie sa ai legaturi cu interlopii, ca sa fugi de ei?
Din cate am inteles, cel omorat nu avea nici in clin nici in maneca, cu cel urmarit.

[/color]
Circula cu masina celui urmarit

28.  The above-mentioned decision noted that the police had intended to enforce a European arrest warrant from the Italian authorities against X, for murder and robbery; the police had received information that he was present in Brăila that day and was hiding in someone else’s flat.

The police had had information that X was part of a criminal gang also frequented by I.A.S., the owner of the Ford Mondeo driven by the applicant on 26 September 2009. In order to find and arrest X, nine police officers from Bucharest had arrived in Brăila that day by car. Two of them had gone to the church where they had expected to see X arriving that day, while the other seven, accompanied by two police officers from Brăila who said they knew X, went to the block of flats where I.A.S.’s Ford Mondeo was parked.

At around noon, the victim and I.A.S. had arrived at the car and had driven away. A police officer, H.E.R., who was participating in the operation was filming with a video camera, and some other police officers had watched the two men with binoculars and believed that they saw X. The decision noted that the accused police officer, D.G., was the head of the operation, and he had decided to follow the car driven by Mr Pârvu, believing that he was following X.

During the incident in question, while trying to stop Mr. Pârvu, D.G. had managed to open the rear left-hand side door of the Fort Mondeo and, while holding his gun, he was slightly hit in the elbow and had lost his balance, with the consequence that he had shot Mr Pârvu by accident. The prosecutor noted that immediately after the shooting and before the ambulance arrived, the police officers had realised that the man who had been shot in the head was not the one they wanted to arrest, namely X.

Link? Si daca ar fi asa, inseamna ca merita sa fie impuscat in cap?

Vă rog să discutați doar despre polițiștii în cauză, nu despre Poliția română în general.

Ma ierti, dar nu sunt de acord.
Politistul era in misiune, nu in timpul liber. Deci responsabilitatea este si a institutiei in asamblul ei si nu doar a unui individ.
Asa cum rezulta si din condamnare, a fost condamnat Statul Roman si institutiile sale.

1662038810[/url]' post='29316609']
e de mirare totusi ca nimeni nu pare sa stie cu ce se ocupa CEDO si ce anume se judeca (s-a judecat) acolo!

Topicul e pe Juridic. Vă rog să discutați doar despre polițiștii în cauză, nu despre Poliția română în general.

A pus Naoto link la hotărârea CEDO, îl mai pun și eu:
https://hudoc.echr.c...eng/#{"itemid":[%22001-218936%22]}

Nu cu a urmăritului, cu a cuiva care făcea parte dintr-o grupare frecventată de el:


Vă rog să citiți decizia dacă vreți să scrieți aici. Știu cum sună asta, dar dacă topicul se face (încă o) varză îl închid.

28.  The above-mentioned decision noted that the police had intended to enforce a European arrest warrant from the Italian authorities against X, for murder and robbery; the police had received information that he was present in Brăila that day and was hiding in someone else’s flat.
The police had had information that X was part of a criminal gang also frequented by I.A.S., the owner of the Ford Mondeo driven by the applicant on 26 September 2009. In order to find and arrest X, nine police officers from Bucharest had arrived in Brăila that day by car. Two of them had gone to the church where they had expected to see X arriving that day, while the other seven, accompanied by two police officers from Brăila who said they knew X, went to the block of flats where I.A.S.’s Ford Mondeo was parked.