Destrămarea mitului că „Pro-România” condus de Ponta ar fi pentru (pro) România

BlueKing-69, on 22 mai 2019 - 19:52, said:

De genist, poate ! De geniu, in nici un caz. O tot fac de vreo 30 de ani, incoace.

george_alexandru, on 22 mai 2019 - 19:54, said:

Nu avem de unde atatia bani, supravietuim din imprumuturi....

george_alexandru, on 22 mai 2019 - 19:54, said:

Ghiobania socialista.

Romanul se da mare democrat si capitalist, dar in realitate se comporta foarte socialist.

radumiki, on 22 mai 2019 - 19:58, said:

Patronii au, dar nu vor sa imparta cu angajatii, pentru munca depusa. Vor sa pastreze cat mai mult pentru ei.

Iochanan, on 22 mai 2019 - 19:54, said:

In fapt, teoretic suntem cu totii oameni.
Restul e gargara, uscaturi sunt peste tot iar celelate rahaturi nationalise nu-ti tin nici de cald nici de foame.

OriginalCopy, on 22 mai 2019 - 20:00, said:

Crede-ma, in proportie de 90% cel putin bugetarii de la varf+politrucii+altii au mai mult decat patronii din  Ro.
Sunt cativa bazati, in topuri, OK. Majoritatea supravietuiesc, poate traiesc bine insa nu la nivelul celor amintiti anterior.
Si asta cu multa munca, stres, alergatura, bataie de cap, etc.

Edited by radumiki, 22 May 2019 - 20:06.

Quote

Cum sa ajungi la concluzia corecta in modul gresit. Ca sa destrami un mit, el trebuie sa existe. Chiar nu era nevoie de paranoia cu distrugerea neamului si tarisoarei ca sa demonstram ca ponta e un cancer lol.

Quote

He's not wrong tho

GingisHan2015, on 22 mai 2019 - 19:18, said:

Eu nu am vazut nici unul din aia 500 k pakistanezi.

Avem vreo 2 milioane de indo-romani,de vreo cateva sute de ani.Insa verii lor se lasa asteptati.

Edited by marius.bunu, 22 May 2019 - 20:14.

marius.bunu, on 22 mai 2019 - 20:13, said:

Încă nu i-ai văzut, dar din toate mișcările din ultima vreme se înțelege că există o disperare la „stăpînii” români să își slujească cu fervoare stăpînii de la nivelul heghemonului imperialist globalist. (Apropo, noi, românii, nu le spunem ălora „indo-români”, noi le spunem țîgani de sute și sute de ani. Noi, românii.)

Însă, stați liniștiți că au „văzut” britanicii cam cum stă treaba cu mixajul de „rectitudine politică” și „bunătate” pakistană:

„The Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal consisted of the organised child sexual abuse that occurred in the northern English town of Rotherham, South Yorkshire, from the late 1980s until the 2010s and the failure of local authorities to act on reports of the abuse throughout most of that period.[8] Researcher Angie Heal, who was hired by local officials and warned them about child exploitation occurring between 2002 and 2007, has since described it as the "biggest child protection scandal in UK history".[9] Evidence of the abuse was first noted in the early 1990s, when care home managers investigated reports that children in their care were being picked up by taxi drivers.[10] From at least 2001, multiple reports passed names of alleged perpetrators, several from one family, to the police and Rotherham Council. The first group conviction took place in 2010, when five British-Pakistani men were convicted of sexual offences against girls aged 12–16.[11] From January 2011 Andrew Norfolk of The Times pressed the issue, reporting in 2012 that the abuse in the town was widespread, and that the police and council had known about it for over ten years.[lower-alpha 1]

The Times articles, along with the 2012 trial of the Rochdale child sex abuse ring, prompted the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee to conduct hearings.[14] Following this and further articles from Norfolk, Rotherham Council commissioned an independent inquiry led by Professor Alexis Jay. In August 2014 the Jay report concluded that an estimated 1,400 children, most of them white girls,[15] had been sexually abused in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013 by predominantly (British-)Pakistani men (Kurdish and Kosovan men were also involved).[16][13] British Asian girls in Rotherham also suffered abuse, but a fear of shame and dishonour made them reluctant to report the abuse to authorities.[17] A "common thread" was that taxi drivers had been picking the children up for sex from care homes and schools.[lower-alpha 2] The abuse included gang rape, forcing children to watch rape, dousing them with petrol and threatening to set them on fire, threatening to rape their mothers and younger sisters, and trafficking them to other towns.[20] There were pregnancies—one at age 12—terminations, miscarriages, babies raised by their mothers, and babies removed, causing further trauma.[21][22][23][24]

(...)

Court records showed 17 cases of localised grooming in 13 northern towns since 1997—14 since 2008—in which 56 men were convicted of sexual offences against girls aged 11–16. The cases involved two or more men who had groomed young girls they had met on the street. Several cases resembled Rotherham, with girls being passed around groups. Of the 56, 53 were Asian, 50 Muslim (mostly Pakistani heritage, and Kurdish and Kosovan men were also involved,[16][13]) and three white.[133][134] Norfolk interviewed two of the affected families, and in January 2011 the first of a series of stories appeared over four pages in The Times, accompanied by an editorial, "Revealed: conspiracy of silence on UK sex gangs".[12] Norfolk told the Home Affairs Committee in 2013 that council staff and senior police officers called him to thank him; one director of children's services told him: "My staff are jumping for joy in the office today because finally somebody has said what we have not felt able to say."[135]”
https://infogalactic...itation_scandal

„Rochdale, Rotherham, Derby, Oxford. The towns change, but the pattern is always the same. Gangs of men, mainly of Pakistani Muslim heritage, lure white girls as young as 10 with gifts and displays of affection. Next, the girl is raped as a way of “breaking her in”. Once the child’s spirit is subdued, and her mind fogged with drugs, she is sold for sex to multiple men at £200 a time. If the girl tries to break away, a gang member might threaten to behead her or firebomb her home. Mohammed Karrar, who was found guilty in the Oxford sex-grooming case this week, took a scalding hairpin and branded one girl so she would know she was his property. Later, the gang gave the same girl a DIY abortion. She was 12 years old. And this, all this, is happening in Britain now.

In a particularly warped twist, the pimp will teach his victim that her parents are racist towards Asians, which is why they disapprove of their relationship – absolutely nothing, of course, to do with him being a violent, controlling thug. Gang members have grown wise to the wimpy ways of Western society. They exploit the fact that police, newly trained in “cultural sensitivity”, are terrified of being accused of racism. So the pimps operate with impunity until, years later, the slave girls find the courage to testify in court against their masters.”
https://www.telegrap...hite-girls.html

marius.bunu, on 22 mai 2019 - 20:13, said:

Daca ar veni astia 500 de mii de veri si s-ar pune pe treaba cu indo-romanii ,la ritmul in care se pleaca din Romania in 20 de ani,romanii ar fi minoritari.

Io pe Ponta mai degraba l-as vedea intr-o alianta post alegeri cu PNL, USR+ decat cu PSD, ALDE. In acea alianta ar fi probabil calcaiul lui Ahile, jucand rolul PD-ului in alianta CDR-ului, cu PD in 1998.
Ce cool ar fi sa se intalneasca in aceeasi barca cu Basescu,

Iochanan,chill,man.
Ia o bere,e cald ,esti prea infierbantat.
Nu vine nici dracu aici, cata vreme romanii pleaca pe capete.

ioana1973, on 22 mai 2019 - 20:49, said:

Cum crezi ca un mitoman notoriu  ar fi in alianta cu USR + + ?

george_alexandru, on 22 mai 2019 - 19:54, said:

Lacomia? Chiar asa,cine il opreste pe patronake roman sa plateasca? (Includ aici si firmele straine din Ro).Doar lacomia lor si prostia sau disperarea angajatilor..

pasilla, on 22 mai 2019 - 20:58, said:

La fel cum l-am vazut pe Roman in alianta cu Coposu, pe Ponta cu liberalii, PDL cu UNPR.....
Daca bine-mi amintesc si premierul Boc era sustinut de PSD in parlament candva prin 2009.

Sustinerea pt interese financiare nu are coloratura politica nici doctrina.

kutie, on 22 mai 2019 - 19:18, said:

Nu e nici o miscare de geniu.Este o miscare perfect predictibila prin care jigodiile din PSD isi conserva perpetuarea in partid,partid care de-a lungul istoriei sale foarte scurte a avut diverse denumiri.
Sa nu uitam ca partidul a stiut sa-si lepede gunoaiele la momentul potrivit:vezi Nastase,vezi Mihaela,dragostea mea,vezi inutilul politic si mincinosul-sef Ponta si urmeaza si penalul Dragnea.Daca chiar si prim-agramata tarii incepe sa maraie in lesa,semnalele sunt foarte clare.
Repet,nimic de geniu.Este doar lupta pentru ciolan,pentru supravietuire politica.Eu tot spun de ani de zile ca PSD este cel mai organizat si mai numeros partid si din pacate inca n-are rival,oricat
ne-am strofoca dreptaci,stangaci sau centristi,ca va fi foarte greu sa desfiintam hegemonia impusa de jigodia de Iliescu in 24.12.1989.

Care mit, frate? Ce om normal la cap a considerat vreodata ca Ponta ar actiona spre binele Romaniei? Poate doar aia care aui fost pe Marte cand a guvernat plagiatorul...

Asta tot din capul pervers al lui Mustacila a iesit: hai sa ne jucam de-a "pesedistul bun" (Ponta, Tariceanu si acolitii) vs "pesedistul rau" (Dragnea, Dancila etc). Trebuie sa ai IQ de copil de gradinita ca sa cazi in capcana asta

GingisHan2015, on 22 mai 2019 - 19:18, said:

Depinde cine vine. Vietnamezi, nepalezi, pinoy, no problem. Mă conversam săptămâna trecută cu proprietarul chinez al unui magazin, într-o română excelentă.
Dacă vorbim despre ahmezi explodaci, no thanks, să și-i păstreze!

george_alexandru, on 22 mai 2019 - 19:54, said:

"Vocea și talentul", vorba aia. Ca să dai, trebuie să iei. Ca să iei trebuie să produci. Ca să produci trebuie să ai ce produce, mai ieftin decât o face China. Ca să fii mai ieftin decât China trebuie să dai salarii mici!
Nu e minunată globalizarea?

Adm, on 22 mai 2019 - 19:28, said:

Adica e un escroc, de ce nu spui lucrurilor pe nume? Ponta e la fel de escroc ca derbedeul de Dragnea dar a citit ceva mai multe carti la tinerete.