Artefacte care sfideaza istoria

Pur si simplu aleator, propun spre discutie Craniul de cristal Mitchell-Hedges. Pe scurt, se presupune ( oficial ) ca acest craniu a fost modelat de mayasi cu peste 1000 ani in urma,

In 1970, Frank Dorland apparently took the skull to the Hewlett Packard Laboratories at Santa Clara, California, at that time one of the world-leaders in electronics, computers and electronic quartz technology. After testing the skull Hewlett Packard Laboratories stated that they could find no microscopic marks on the crystal which would indicate it had been worked with metal instruments.  Apparently the Lab also stated that the skull had been carved against the natural grain of the crystal, and were at a loss to know why it hadn’t shattered during manufacture. From this Dorland concluded that the original quartz block must have been first chiselled into a rough shape, possibly using diamonds, before grinding and polishing with water and sand. This painstakingly slow job would, according to Dorland, have required up to 300 years to complete, doubling Mitchell-Hedges already exaggerated claims for the creation of the object, and involving manufacture over several generations.

However, there is no evidence at all for such sensational results at Hewlett Packard Laboratories. All that the lab tests in fact discovered was that the Skull was fashioned from a single crystal of quartz, nothing more.  The rest is fiction.

However, there is no evidence at all for such sensational results at Hewlett Packard Laboratories. All that the lab tests in fact discovered was that the Skull was fashioned from a single crystal of quartz, nothing more.  The rest is fiction.

Bun, dar tot nu explică cum l-au făcut, nu ?

Propun acest topic pentru prezentarea de artefacte a caror existenta intra in contradictie cu nivelul tehnologic  din timpul perioadei in care au fost descoperite / datate.

Eu asteptam comentarii libere

Insa acest Craniu de cristal nu prezinta nici cea mai mica urma de prelucrare cu orice fel de instrument !

Ca precizare - intră în contradicție cu nivelul tehnologic cunoscut în acest moment.

Adică te așteptai să scriem o leacă de SF care să integreze numite artefacte?

Ce urma vrei sa prezinte, daca este slefuit manual umed, o tehnica bine cunoscuta in sec. 19?

Hai să vedem dacă există astfel de artefacte.

Eu cred că și dacă unele ar fi reale, nu ar schimba prea mult istoria, dar ar rdica niște semne de întrebare, și tot e ceva.

Este important de subliniat ca acest artefact a fost găsit întâmplător în ruinele unui templu mayaș, ” the temple  of fallen stones ”, în orașul antic Lubaantun din Belize.

Deci insisti sa mergi pe varianta cu povesti nemuritoare?