Chirurgia spinală minim invazivă
Chirurgia spinală minim invazivă oferă pacienților oportunitatea unui tratament eficient, permițându-le o recuperare ultra rapidă și nu în ultimul rând minimizând leziunile induse chirurgical. Echipa noastră utilizează un spectru larg de tehnici minim invazive, din care enumerăm câteva: endoscopia cu variantele ei (transnazală, transtoracică, transmusculară, etc), microscopul operator, abordurile trans tubulare și nu în ultimul rând infiltrațiile la toate nivelurile coloanei vertebrale. www.neurohope.ro |
IMDb si-a inchis forumurile de discutii
Last Updated: Mar 01 2017 11:13, Started by
MrReason
, Feb 21 2017 01:35
·
0
#1
Posted 21 February 2017 - 01:35
IMDb Message Boards Announcement
The IMDb message boards were disabled on February 20, 2017. This included the Private Message system. IMDb is passionately committed to providing innovative ways for our hundreds of millions of users to engage and communicate with one another. We will continue to enhance our current offerings and launch new features in 2017 and beyond that will help our customers communicate and express themselves in meaningful ways while leveraging emerging technologies and opportunities. http://www.imdb.com/...ref_=nv_cm_bd_1 Si au sters si materialul existent. Pacat. Prea multi sensibilosi au ajuns sa aiba acces la internet si sa se vaiete din toate nimicurile. |
#2
Posted 21 February 2017 - 01:52
#3
Posted 21 February 2017 - 02:47
Le-au închis pt. că nu existau moderatori şi utilizatorii o luau adesea razna cu tot soiul de postări infecte.
|
#4
Posted 21 February 2017 - 04:29
Nu trebuia inchis din cauza catorva natarai. Majoritatea discutiilor erau cat se poate de ok.
|
#5
Posted 21 February 2017 - 07:42
Off... erau discutii interesante, merita sau nu vazut un film/serial...
|
#6
Posted 21 February 2017 - 08:39
O mare prostie. Pentru asta intram pe IMDB: sa vad nota, sa citesc rewiev-urile si argumentele pro sau contra. Doar ca sa vad cu cine este si pentru trivia, pe care nu o citesc niciodata, nu mai intru. Ai probleme cu forumul, dar cand vei avea probleme cu scaderea traficului cum va fi? Sau "e prea mare sa cada"?
|
#7
Posted 21 February 2017 - 09:32
pai au inchis doar forumul nu si sectiunea de review-uri
Au inchis doar sectiunea asta: http://www.imdb.com/boards/ Am intrat doar de vreo 2-3 ori pe acel forum, in rest poti in continuare sa lasi aici review-uri: http://www.imdb.com/...ter?ref_=tt_urv Era ceva mai ascunsa acea zona, cred ca nu mai faceau fata cu moderarea spam-ului si au ajuns la concluzia ca genera doar costuri. Quote
Some outlets claim that IMDb’s assertion that the site no longer provides a “positive, useful experience” refers to those trolling the boards. US entertainment website the Wrap highlighted the recent example of Raoul Peck’s Oscar-nominated documentary I Am Not Your Negro being hit with a slew of negative and one-star reviews before its official release date as a tipping point. And you don’t have to wade far into the films’ boards to find them riddled with racist, ignorant and posturingly obtuse comments. “IMDb say that the boards have been overtaken by trolls, but they could easily make it harder for people to troll, by hindering them creating multiple accounts.” Dan L began an online petition to save the boards, currently at just under 10,000 signatures. He suspects the invocation of trolls is little more than a smokescreen. He believes the real reason is a combination of much lower user numbers than IMDb is publicising, and the way in which the boards and ratings are being exploited. “They make bold claims such as 250 million monthly users worldwide. If IMDb really had 250 million users how come the movie with the most ratings, Shawshank Redemption, only has 1.7m votes? I don’t see how they can have 3.3% of the world’s population regularly using the site.” Sign up to the new-look Media Briefing: bigger, better, brighter Read more There is also the issue of user ratings and boards being exploited to make a film seem as if it was more warmly received than it might have been, via ratings from false accounts. Dan uses the 2016 film Beta Test as an example of a fraudulently rated film in which half of the film’s apparent viewers have rated it a 9 or a 10, though the “top voters” (those with accounted for and regularly active accounts) have only rated it an average of 4.6. “The message boards have become a liability in terms of their credibility, and this might lead to less companies wanting to advertise with them.” One of the more disappointing aspects of the boards’ closure, he believes, is the lack of consultation of IMDb’s users, especially as the website relies so heavily on them providing the trivia and information. A regular participator in the IMDb community, Dan even met his current partner via the boards, moving from Sweden to Scotland to live with her. “The message boards were at one point the only social outlet I had,” he says. “And it’s a bit of a slap in the face.” Articolul complet: https://www.theguard...-message-boards |
#8
Posted 21 February 2017 - 10:30
Baghe, on 21 februarie 2017 - 08:39, said:
Pentru asta intram pe IMDB: sa vad nota, sa citesc rewiev-urile si argumentele pro sau contra. Astea le vezi si acum. Iar nota aia... sa fim seriosi. Nu indica realitatea. Sunt o groaza de filme slabe cu nota mare - chiar dinainte sa apara. Fanii actorilor care joaca in film ( si nu numai ) incearca sa ridice fimul cat mai sus. |
#9
Posted 21 February 2017 - 11:17
Pai Star Wars Episode VII a avut peste 9 chiar inainte sa se lanseze filmul. Si erau o multime de voturi.
|
#10
Posted 21 February 2017 - 11:17
La ce experinte am trait incercand sa discut niste filme aici, in SP...Banuiesc ca si acolo era cam la fel..
Edited by Prien, 21 February 2017 - 11:18. |
|
#11
Posted 21 February 2017 - 11:41
Erau canceroase forumurile alea, topicurile perverse, rasiste sau sexiste faceau 80% din discutii.
|
#13
Posted 21 February 2017 - 13:26
gumball3000, on 21 februarie 2017 - 09:32, said:
Am intrat doar de vreo 2-3 ori pe acel forum, in rest poti in continuare sa lasi aici review-uri: http://www.imdb.com/...ter?ref_=tt_urv Era ceva mai ascunsa acea zona, cred ca nu mai faceau fata cu moderarea spam-ului si au ajuns la concluzia ca genera doar costuri. Mizu, on 21 februarie 2017 - 11:41, said:
Erau canceroase forumurile alea, topicurile perverse, rasiste sau sexiste faceau 80% din discutii. Niste exemple de topicuri din webarchive: The Godfather: Why didnt Don Barzini send a hit squad to Don Corleones house? riddick-11114 What would Vito think about Fredos wife Deanna Dunn? riddick-11114 Really liked the movie, but I have a few questions. EricCartmanBrah Couldn't Michael still run for senator or governor after becoming don? rey-qiu Other ways of dealing with McCluskey? rey-qiu Anyone else prefer Al Pacino in this movie? Sanzagh https://web.archive....itle/tt0068646/ Casino Why didnt Ace have Nicky kill Pat Webb? Matthew7819 Jamie Lee Curtis or Jodie Foster as Ginger? lynchislife95 Ginger is such a LEECH!!! ali8970 The hammer scene. thomaswilliamboner Why didn't Ace get rid of Ginger? basketballplayer314 Sam and the skim tvang21 https://web.archive....?ref_=tt_rec_tt E.T. 32 year old man and still cry. wilss888 Star Wars connection. drewstewartcolumbia Is it the puppet E.T. that dates this movie? cliffcarson-502-470231 Filming Locations centipede84 Over-emotional thenachoman Goosebumps daveygenius https://web.archive....itle/tt0083866/ Star Wars A New Hope (asta avea peste 10 pagini de topicuri) [ https://i.imgur.com/9EIEoii.png - Pentru incarcare in pagina (embed) Click aici ] Filmele cu tematica rasista/anti-rasista evident ca pot isca fel de fel de discutii. Dar nu vad de ce sa inchizi o asemenea facilitate pentru toate filmele(si nici macar pentru ale unde se da in rasism sau altele - cui nu-i place, out) Edited by MrReason, 21 February 2017 - 13:30. |
#14
Posted 21 February 2017 - 13:32
O prostie, ma uitam pe imdb doar pentru comentarii. Puteai de exemplu sa intrebi despre filme similare sau sa discuti finalul unui film pe care nu l-ai inteles. Ca se certau unii pe diverse teme, asa si? Pai sa se inchida si Softpedia ca si aici se mai cearta lumea.. E asta o solutie? Or sa piarda trafic mult. Pentru reviewuri nu ma intereseaza, gusturile nu se discuta. De multe ori citesc un review care zice ca e filmul prost de tot si este exact pe dos cand il vad si invers
Edited by gerbil, 21 February 2017 - 13:32. |
#15
Posted 21 February 2017 - 17:42
Nu ii ala motivul
Discutiile alea au inceput sa afecteze industria. Multi stiu acum ca scorurile si recenziile nu mai sunt relevante si intra la mesaje sa vada ce parere au oamenii obisnuiti despre film. Si la filmele noi parerile le sunt cam defavorabile Sunt discutii pe themoviedb.org, platforma e superioara imdb-ului dar e mai pustiu. Acum ca astia si-au inchis pravalia probabil multi or sa migreze pe themoviedb |
|
#16
Posted 21 February 2017 - 17:49
Motivul oricum pare a fi unul financiar.
Nu cred ca e vreunul de acolo nebun sa fi inchis forumul asa de capul lui. |
#17
Posted 21 February 2017 - 17:59
Trendul nu este nou:
http://edition.cnn.c...mment-sections/ https://medium.com/g...ns-ea31139c469d http://www.niemanlab...eader-comments/ s.a.m.d. Cand continutul generat de utilizatori (faimoasa revolutie WEB 2.0) probabil ca ajunge la un nivel critic de "garbage" (generand si pierderi financiare) se trece la eliminarea factorului generator de probleme. Nimic anormal. |
#18
Posted 21 February 2017 - 18:05
Continutul generat de utilizatori (garbage in mare proportie) necesita forta de munca care sa trieze, adica bani.
Ce am observat eu in ultima vreme e ca se inmultisera topicurile de reclame, iar cineva trebuie sa stea acolo sa actioneze la Report. |
Anunturi
▶ 0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users