Aplicarea modelului nordic în România

The Nordic model (or Nordic capitalism[1] or Nordic social democracy)[2][3] refers to the economic and social models of the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, Iceland, Greenland, Faroe Islands and Sweden), which involves the combination of a free market economy with a welfare state.[4]

"The Nordic Model - Embracing globalization and sharing risks" characterizes the system as follows:[15]
An elaborate social safety net in addition to public services such as free education and universal healthcare.[15]
Strong property rights, contract enforcement, and overall ease of doing business.[16]
Public pension plans.[15]
Low barriers to free trade.[17] This is combined with collective risk sharing (social programs, labour market institutions) which has provided a form of protection against the risks associated with economic openness.[15]
Little product market regulation. Nordic countries rank very high in product market freedom according to OECD rankings.[15]
Low levels of corruption.[15] In Transparency International's 2014 Corruption Perceptions Index all five Nordic countries were ranked among the 12 least corrupt of 176 evaluated countries, and Denmark, Finland, Sweden and Norway all ranked within top 5.[18]
High percentage of workers belonging to a labour union. In 2010, labour union density was 69.9% in Finland, 68.3% in Sweden, and 54.8% in Norway. In comparison, labour union density was 12.9% in Mexico and 11.3% in the United States.[19] The lower union density in Norway is mainly explained by the absence of a Ghent system since 1938. In contrast, Denmark, Finland and Sweden all have union-run unemployment funds.[20]
A partnership between employers, trade unions and the government, whereby these social partners negotiate the terms to regulating the workplace among themselves, rather than the terms being imposed by law.[21] Sweden has decentralised wage co-ordination, while Finland is ranked the least flexible.[15] The changing economic conditions have given rise to fear among workers as well as resistance by trade unions in regards to reforms.[15] At the same time, reforms and favourable economic development seem to have reduced unemployment, which has traditionally been higher. Denmark's Social Democrats managed to push through reforms in 1994 and 1996 (see flexicurity).
Sweden at 56.6% of GDP, Denmark at 51.7%, and Finland at 48.6% reflects very high public spending.[17] One key reason for public spending is the large number of public employees. These employees work in various fields including education, healthcare, and for the government itself. They often have lifelong job security and make up around a third of the workforce (more than 38% in Denmark). Public spending in social transfers such as unemployment benefits and early-retirement programmes is high. In 2001, the wage-based unemployment benefits were around 90% of wage in Denmark and 80% in Sweden, compared to 75% in the Netherlands and 60% in Germany. The unemployed were also able to receive benefits several years before reductions, compared to quick benefit reduction in other countries.
Public expenditure for health and education is significantly higher in Denmark, Sweden, and Norway in comparison to the OECD average.[22]
Overall tax burdens (as a percentage of GDP) are among the world's highest; Sweden (51.1%), Denmark (46% in 2011),[23] and Finland (43.3%), compared to non-Nordic countries like Germany (34.7%), Canada (33.5%), and Ireland (30.5%).
The United Nations World Happiness Report 2013 shows that the happiest nations are concentrated in Northern Europe, with Denmark topping the list. The Nordics ranked highest on the metrics of real GDP per capita, healthy life expectancy, having someone to count on, perceived freedom to make life choices, generosity and freedom from corruption.[24]
The Nordic countries received the highest ranking for protecting workers rights on the International Trade Union Confederation's 2014 Global Rights Index, with Denmark being the only nation to receive a perfect score.[25]

Eu personal cred că ar fi cea mai bună cale pentru România.

Multe țari nordice erau foarte sărace în trecut.

modelul japonez ce are?!?
cum dracu ca noi vrem numai modele in care sa stam degeaba si sa traim bine... modelele alea cu munca, nu ne plac!

Norvegia, Suedia, Danemarca, sunt in primul rand monarhii ( si amintita Japonie, de asemenea ).
Si Olanda la fel, care tot in nord este fata de noi.
Ala este sistemul principal.

In rest, tarile nordice au un sistem socialist imputin, pe care nu-l sufera nici cetatenii onorabili ai acelor tari.
La pensie, statul iti ia tot, si iti da cu taraita cat vrea sistemu'.
Ei sunt obisnuiti sa traiasca in comunitati socialiste de mii de ani, din cauza asta suporta mai usor, chiar daca si ei scrasnesc din dinti.

In alte tari, nu doar in RO, ci in lumea larga, in general nu se poate implementa asa ceva, pt. ca oamenii nu accepta asa usor toate aberatiile impuse de altii.
Mai concret, dincolo de faptul ca nu ar fi sustinuti politic, oamenii care chiar muncesc, nu ar mai fi motivati sa o faca, si majoritatea a prefera fie sa frece menta, fie sa se care din tara.

Așa, deci sunt niște comuniști împuțiți nordicii ăștia, freacă manga, de asta viața are o calitate mai bună la ei. Trăiau în comunități de mii de ani și asta i-a făcut să nu fie egoiști, să fie altruiști, binevoitori și solidari deci niște comuniști împuțiți.

Acolo oamenii muncesc cu spor

Daca Romania ar fi o tara nordica, cu o polulatie nordica probabil am putea aplica sistemul nordic si ar fi un succes. Altfel nu prea vad cu ce ne-ar ajuta sa iesim din rahat.

Nordicii nu muncesc sau ce? Atât doar că cel care muncește în Danemarca este și protejat. Și românii muncesc destul dar ineficient.