I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
ce sneupti?
:wink:
Asta nu e engleza, e prosteala
QUOTE(Bebeluska @ Apr 14 2006, 12:34) 
Asta nu e engleza, e prosteala
Nu este evident ca studiul urmareste altceva ?
este un test care tine sa demonstreze ca cititul ajunge la un nivel in care experienta si repetarea mecanica pot face subconstientul sa lucreze. faptul ca esti capabil ca citesti fluent un text scris incorect reliefeaza faptul ca cititul ajunge la un punct in care fragmentele nu mai conteaza si privirea de ansamblu genereaza capacitatea de decriptare si reasamblare a fragmentelor inconstient, fara sa mai lucreze atentia!
ati inteles ceva?
ati inteles ceva?
QUOTE(Krissa @ Apr 16 2006, 00:04)
ati inteles ceva?
noi dam din cap si tu adormi linistita ca am inteles
da chiar am inteles
oricum, faza e destul de veche si interesanta
QUOTE(shobi @ Apr 16 2006, 00:05)
noi dam din cap si tu adormi linistita ca am inteles
da chiar am inteles
oricum, faza e destul de veche si interesanta
da chiar am inteles
oricum, faza e destul de veche si interesanta
cica daca ajungi la capacitatea de a citi la fel si un text scris invers esti apoape geniu!
mie nu mi-a iesit!
QUOTE(Krissa @ Apr 16 2006, 00:08)
cica daca ajungi la capacitatea de a citi la fel si un text scris invers esti apoape geniu!
mie nu mi-a iesit!
mie nu mi-a iesit!
cred ca e ca si cum ai invata alta limba, cum ar fi araba
QUOTE(sandossu @ Apr 16 2006, 00:17)
cred ca e ca si cum ai invata alta limba, cum ar fi araba
stiai sau ai plesnit-o?
dar de asta ce spuneti?
"1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d"
"1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d"
QUOTE(Onixrg @ Apr 27 2006, 12:21)
dar de asta ce spuneti?
"1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d"
"1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d"
P3 |4n64 f4p7u| (4 (h35714 4574 3 d357u| d3 v3(h3, n1(1 m4(4r nu 3 0n-70p1(, 7hr34du| 4574 3r4 d35pr3 57ud1u| 4(3|4 (4r3 d3m0n57r4 (4 m1n734 um4n4 p0473 (171 (uv1n73|3 51 d4(4 num41 pr1m4 51 u|71m4 |173r4 d1n f13(4r3 (uv4n7 5un7 |4 |0(u| |0r...
QUOTE(Krissa @ Apr 16 2006, 00:08)
cica daca ajungi la capacitatea de a citi la fel si un text scris invers esti apoape geniu!
mie nu mi-a iesit!
mie nu mi-a iesit!
io pot daca folosesc o oglinda, sint un geniu?
super!tinand cont ca eu am deschis topicul, e putin out-there sa-mi spui despre ce era.
sa spunem ca era in particular despre faptul ca mintea umana poate citi cuvintele chiar daca literele din interiorul fiecaruia nu sunt in ordine.
dar in general, era vorba despre faptul ca mintea umana are o capacitate deosebita de a procesa cuvintele ca imagini, ca intreg, e o capacitate de sinteza, de panoramare, si subliniaza inca o data tendinta cognitiva de economie
si, tangential legat de asta, dar m-a impresionat mult este stirea de ieri a lui Tarko
daca nu ati citit-o, v-o recomand
QUOTE(Onixrg @ Apr 27 2006, 23:20)
super!tinand cont ca eu am deschis topicul, e putin out-there sa-mi spui despre ce era.
sa spunem ca era in particular despre faptul ca mintea umana poate citi cuvintele chiar daca literele din interiorul fiecaruia nu sunt in ordine.
dar in general, era vorba despre faptul ca mintea umana are o capacitate deosebita de a procesa cuvintele ca imagini, ca intreg, e o capacitate de sinteza, de panoramare, si subliniaza inca o data tendinta cognitiva de economie
si, tangential legat de asta, dar m-a impresionat mult este stirea de ieri a lui Tarko
daca nu ati citit-o, v-o recomand
Sorry nu vazusem ca tu deschisesei threadul
[well ma doare capul ]
Las' ca a fost productiv. Nici nu m-am gandit ca este deja ca un alt limbaj al semnelor grafice cum ai raspuns si tu. Ma gandeam initial ca a fost o potriveala reusita. Chiar imi place ideea. Mare lucru mintea asta!
QUOTE(Mosotti @ Apr 27 2006, 23:12)
io pot daca folosesc o oglinda, sint un geniu?
NU
QUOTE(Onixrg @ Apr 13 2006, 15:45)
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
ce sneupti?
:wink:
ce sneupti?
:wink:
?itpuens ec
!ttnarompi saw gnilepls tohuhgt saylwa i dna heay ?huh ginazma .eholw a sa dorw eht tub ,feltsi yb retetl yevre dear ton soed dinm nmauh eht eaesucb si shit .mlebrop a tihtuow ti dear lltis nac uoy dna sesm ltoat a eb nac tesr eht . .ealcp tihgr eht ni eb reettl tasl dna tsirf eht that si gnhit tntaomrpi ynlo eht ,era dorw a ni sreettl eht rdero thaw ni reattm t'nsoed ti ,ysitvreniu edgirbamc ta hcraeehcsr a ot ginrdccoa ,dinm naumh eht fo roewp laenmnoahp eht .geinadr saw i thaw drntandseu ytlcalua doulc i that eeievlb tloundc I
__________
luati-l pe asta. precum arabii.
QUOTE(Krissa @ Apr 16 2006, 00:04)
este un test care tine sa demonstreze ca cititul ajunge la un nivel in care experienta si repetarea mecanica pot face subconstientul sa lucreze. faptul ca esti capabil ca citesti fluent un text scris incorect reliefeaza faptul ca cititul ajunge la un punct in care fragmentele nu mai conteaza si privirea de ansamblu genereaza capacitatea de decriptare si reasamblare a fragmentelor inconstient, fara sa mai lucreze atentia!
ati inteles ceva?
ati inteles ceva?
da. ca poti citi un cuvant instinctivvizualizand primele 2-3 litere din stanga cuvantului, desi el ar putea fi scris gresit .
QUOTE(Onixrg @ Apr 13 2006, 07:45)
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
ce sneupti?
:wink:
ce sneupti?
:wink:
I couldn't believe that I could actually understand what I was reading.According to The phenomenal power of the human mind, at Cambridge University,it doesn't matter in what order the letters are in a word,the only important thing is that the first and last letter be in the right place.The rest can be a total mess and you can still read it without a problem.this is because the human mind does not read every letter by itself,but the word as a whole.Amazing huh? Yeah and I always thought spelling was important!
QUOTE(Onixrg @ Apr 13 2006, 14:45)
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
ce sneupti?
:wink:
ce sneupti?
:wink:
aa da..am avut chiar textul asta anu trecut la cambridge, mi se pare ca la english in use....doar ca tu ai incurcat intentionat textul, nu? ...is super interesante textele astea de la cambridge...numai ca atunci cand ti le da sa faci exercitii asupra lor isi pierd din interes si devin uracioase pt ca-ti dau batai de cap.
QUOTE(Onixrg @ Apr 13 2006, 14:45)
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
ce sneupti?
:wink:
ce sneupti?
:wink:
I've read about this a looong time ago (almost a year now)... Only it wasn't by Cambridge university, but by some "did you know?" site.
Conclusion: old stuff (but interesting).
QUOTE(Nefersetty @ Jan 24 2007, 19:19)
I couldn't believe that I could actually understand what I was reading.According to The phenomenal power of the human mind, at Cambridge University,it doesn't matter in what order the letters are in a word,the only important thing is that the first and last letter be in the right place.The rest can be a total mess and you can still read it without a problem.this is because the human mind does not read every letter by itself,but the word as a whole.Amazing huh? Yeah and I always thought spelling was important!
I had no problems whatsoever with deciphering it right from the first attempt...
It's not that difficult, after all...But your "translation" is not quite correct, you missed some words...
All the best.
QUOTE (rashid @ Apr 27 2006, 21:48)
P3 |4n64 f4p7u| (4 (h35714 4574 3 d357u| d3 v3(h3, n1(1 m4(4r nu 3 0n-70p1(, 7hr34du| 4574 3r4 d35pr3 57ud1u| 4(3|4 (4r3 d3m0n57r4 (4 m1n734 um4n4 p0473 (171 (uv1n73|3 51 d4(4 num41 pr1m4 51 u|71m4 |173r4 d1n f13(4r3 (uv4n7 5un7 |4 |0(u| |0r...
lol
P.S.
e cand n-am mai zis "lol" cool topic
Era ceva subiect de genu la Canguru.
QUOTE (Deria_Leena26 @ Mar 7 2007, 00:46)
I had no problems whatsoever with deciphering it right from the first attempt... It's not that difficult, after all...
But your "translation" is not quite correct, you missed some words...
All the best.
It's not that difficult, after all...But your "translation" is not quite correct, you missed some words...
All the best.
pai probabil vroia sa imbine cele 2 metode: si incurcatul unor litere in interiorul cuvintelor, si scrisul invers; chiar si asa, tot te poti descurca
I couldnt believe that I could aulaclty understand what I was rdanieg. The phenomenal power of the human mind, according to a research at Cambridge University, it deosn't matter in what order the letters in a word are, the only important thing is that the first and last be in the right place. The rest can be a total mess and you can still read it without a problem. This is because we the human mind deos not read every letter by itself, but the word as a whole. Amazing huh? yeah and I always thought spelling was important!
Aceasta este o versiune simplificatã a paginii originale. Pentru a vizita versiunea originala click aici.