despre CSS in SEO

- elementele relevante din pagina trebuiesc subliniate vizual (BOLD, FONT-SIZE mare), insa NU o faceti din CSS ! Stiu ca e contra curentului actual de optimizare, insa motoarele de cautare nu interpreteaza si css-ul.

adica cum ? daca am un text intr-un div, nu mi-l vede ?

as vrea si eu cateva explicatii... pls !

Adica in loc sa ii dai o clasa acelor cuvinte iar in CSS sa bagi "font-weight: bold;" sa pui

<strong></strong>

in jurul cuvantului/cuvintelor. De asemenea, se poate folosi

<em></em>

pentru italicizarea cuvintelor.

rescriu : diferenta dintre <b> si font-weight:bold;

cum adica nu inseamna nimic : nu le iau in considerare, sunt invizibile, :( ?
chiar nu pricep si sunt disperat pentru ca am multe astfel chestii prin pagini

[On bold vs strong]

I need to clarify something about strong vs bold and emphasize vs italics. There was a previous question where somebody asked about whether it was better to use <b>, or whether it was better to use <strong>. Because bold is what everybody used in the old days (when the dinosaurs where roaming the earth) and strong is what the W3C recommends. At that time, last night [Sunday, July 30], I thought that we just barely, barely, barely – like, an epsilon – preferred bold over strong... and I said, for the most part don’t worry about it.

The nice thing is, an engineer actually took me to the code where I could see it for myself... and Google does treat bold and strong with exactly the same weight (thank you for that Paul, I really appreciate it!). In addition, I checked, he also found code that showed that <em> and <i> are treated exactly the same as well.

So there you have it – go forth and markup like the W3C would like you to do it! Do it semantically well, and don’t worry so much about crufty old tags, because Google will support them just the same either way.

So what does this mean? If you are into the finer details of the semantics of markup, use <strong> and <em> tags. If you are into minimizing typing time, use <b> and <i>. We personally prefer to use <strong> and <em>, as we are simply in the habit of maximizing compliance with standards and recommendations, whenever it does not interfere with business results (which is most, but not all of the time).

Later edit: in legatura cu problema css vs. bold/strong, aceasta se rezuma asa: google citeste documentul html in sine, nu citeste css-ul si nici javascripturile decat intr-o masura foarte mica (din cate stiu). atfel incat un <span style="font-size:bold">test</span> are aceeasi relevanta pt motorul de cautare ca si cuvantul test scris normal (desi browserul il bolduieste). In acelasi timp <strong>test</strong sau <b>test</b> ii semnalizeaza robotului care citeste pagina ca respectivul text este important pentru document. (are o anumita relevanta, mai mare decat a contentului normal).